Peripheral Nerve Blocks for Ambulatory Shoulder Surgery: A Population-based Cohort Study of Outcomes and Resource Utilization. (December 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Peripheral Nerve Blocks for Ambulatory Shoulder Surgery: A Population-based Cohort Study of Outcomes and Resource Utilization. (December 2019)
- Main Title:
- Peripheral Nerve Blocks for Ambulatory Shoulder Surgery
- Authors:
- Hamilton, Gavin M.
Ramlogan, Reva
Lui, Anne
McCartney, Colin J. L.
Abdallah, Faraj
McVicar, Jason
McIsaac, Daniel I. - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background: Nerve blocks improve early pain after ambulatory shoulder surgery; impact on postdischarge outcomes is poorly described. Our objective was to measure the association between nerve blocks and health system outcomes after ambulatory shoulder surgery. Methods: We conducted a population-based cohort study using linked administrative data from 118 hospitals in Ontario, Canada. Adults having elective ambulatory shoulder surgery (open or arthroscopic) from April 1, 2009, to December 31, 2016, were included. After validation of physician billing codes to identify nerve blocks, we used multilevel, multivariable regression to estimate the association of nerve blocks with a composite of unplanned admissions, emergency department visits, readmissions or death within 7 days of surgery (primary outcome) and healthcare costs (secondary outcome). Neurology consultations and nerve conduction studies were measured as safety indicators. Results: We included 59, 644 patients; blocks were placed in 31, 073 (52.1%). Billing codes accurately identified blocks (positive likelihood ratio 16.83, negative likelihood ratio 0.03). The composite outcome was not significantly different in patients with a block compared with those without (2, 808 [9.0%] vs . 3, 424 [12.0%]; adjusted odds ratio 0.96; 95% CI 0.89 to 1.03; P = 0.243). Healthcare costs were greater with a block (adjusted ratio of means 1.06; 95% CI 1.02 to 1.10; absolute increase $325; 95% CI $316 to $333; P = 0.005).Abstract : Background: Nerve blocks improve early pain after ambulatory shoulder surgery; impact on postdischarge outcomes is poorly described. Our objective was to measure the association between nerve blocks and health system outcomes after ambulatory shoulder surgery. Methods: We conducted a population-based cohort study using linked administrative data from 118 hospitals in Ontario, Canada. Adults having elective ambulatory shoulder surgery (open or arthroscopic) from April 1, 2009, to December 31, 2016, were included. After validation of physician billing codes to identify nerve blocks, we used multilevel, multivariable regression to estimate the association of nerve blocks with a composite of unplanned admissions, emergency department visits, readmissions or death within 7 days of surgery (primary outcome) and healthcare costs (secondary outcome). Neurology consultations and nerve conduction studies were measured as safety indicators. Results: We included 59, 644 patients; blocks were placed in 31, 073 (52.1%). Billing codes accurately identified blocks (positive likelihood ratio 16.83, negative likelihood ratio 0.03). The composite outcome was not significantly different in patients with a block compared with those without (2, 808 [9.0%] vs . 3, 424 [12.0%]; adjusted odds ratio 0.96; 95% CI 0.89 to 1.03; P = 0.243). Healthcare costs were greater with a block (adjusted ratio of means 1.06; 95% CI 1.02 to 1.10; absolute increase $325; 95% CI $316 to $333; P = 0.005). Prespecified sensitivity analyses supported these results. Safety indicators were not different between groups. Conclusions: In ambulatory shoulder surgery, nerve blocks were not associated with a significant difference in adverse postoperative outcomes. Costs were statistically higher with a block, but this increase is not likely clinically relevant. Abstract : Peripheral nerve blocks are associated with a decrease in unplanned admissions after ambulatory shoulder surgery. There is no associated improvement in other postoperative outcomes such as emergency department visits, readmissions, mortality, or costs.Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Anesthesiology. Volume 131:Number 6(2019)
- Journal:
- Anesthesiology
- Issue:
- Volume 131:Number 6(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 131, Issue 6 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 131
- Issue:
- 6
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0131-0006-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2019-12
- Subjects:
- Anesthesiology -- Periodicals
Anesthetics -- Periodicals
Anesthesia -- Periodicals
617.9605 - Journal URLs:
- http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&NEWS=n&CSC=Y&PAGE=toc&D=yrovft&AN=00000542-000000000-00000 ↗
http://www.mdconsult.com/public/search?search_type=journal&j_sort=pub_date&j_issn=0003-3022 ↗
http://www.anesthesiology.org ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗
http://journals.lww.com/anesthesiology/pages/default.aspx ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002865 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0003-3022
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 0900.600000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 18932.xml