Urethral Catheterization Is Not Necessary During Nononcological Laparoscopic Pelvic Surgery. Issue 4 (December 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Urethral Catheterization Is Not Necessary During Nononcological Laparoscopic Pelvic Surgery. Issue 4 (December 2019)
- Main Title:
- Urethral Catheterization Is Not Necessary During Nononcological Laparoscopic Pelvic Surgery
- Authors:
- Nevins, Edward J.
Nevins, Elizabeth G.
Moori, Parisa L.
Strong, Catherine
Al-Zubaidi, Samim
Wayman, John
Karat, Dayalan - Abstract:
- Abstract : Objectives: Expert opinion remains divided regarding whether routine urethral catheterization is required before nononcological laparoscopic pelvic surgery. Catheterization is thought to reduce the incidence of bladder injury when inserting a suprapubic laparoscopic port and prevent obstruction of the view of the pelvis because of bladder filling. However, catheterization comes with a risk of nosocomial infection and harbors financial cost. Moreover, indwelling catheters inhibit early mobilization and increase postoperative discomfort. Methods: A systematic review was undertaken using the Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies guidelines to identify eligible publications. End points included bladder injury, positive postoperative urinary microbiology, and postoperative urinary symptoms. Results: The reported incidence rates of laparoscopic bladder injury in included publications ranges from 0% to 1.3%. Importantly, bladder injury has occurred during both catheterized and noncatheterized operations. Our meta-analysis also shows that patients who are catheterized have a 2.33 times relative risk of developing postoperative positive microbiology in their urine ( P = 0.01) and a 2.41 times relative risk of postoperative urinary symptoms ( P = 0.005), when compared with noncatheterized patients. Conclusions: This meta-analysis indicates that omitting a catheter in emergency and elective nononcological laparoscopic pelvic surgery may be a safe option. CatheterizationAbstract : Objectives: Expert opinion remains divided regarding whether routine urethral catheterization is required before nononcological laparoscopic pelvic surgery. Catheterization is thought to reduce the incidence of bladder injury when inserting a suprapubic laparoscopic port and prevent obstruction of the view of the pelvis because of bladder filling. However, catheterization comes with a risk of nosocomial infection and harbors financial cost. Moreover, indwelling catheters inhibit early mobilization and increase postoperative discomfort. Methods: A systematic review was undertaken using the Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies guidelines to identify eligible publications. End points included bladder injury, positive postoperative urinary microbiology, and postoperative urinary symptoms. Results: The reported incidence rates of laparoscopic bladder injury in included publications ranges from 0% to 1.3%. Importantly, bladder injury has occurred during both catheterized and noncatheterized operations. Our meta-analysis also shows that patients who are catheterized have a 2.33 times relative risk of developing postoperative positive microbiology in their urine ( P = 0.01) and a 2.41 times relative risk of postoperative urinary symptoms ( P = 0.005), when compared with noncatheterized patients. Conclusions: This meta-analysis indicates that omitting a catheter in emergency and elective nononcological laparoscopic pelvic surgery may be a safe option. Catheterization does not remove the risk of bladder injury but results in more urinary tract infections and symptoms. It may be reasonable to ask a patient to void immediately before anesthesia, after which an on-table bladder scan should be performed. If there is minimal residual volume, a urinary catheter may not be necessary, unless operative time is estimated to be greater than 90 minutes. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of patient safety. Volume 15:Issue 4(2019)
- Journal:
- Journal of patient safety
- Issue:
- Volume 15:Issue 4(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 15, Issue 4 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 15
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0015-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2019-12
- Subjects:
- bladder scan -- infection -- laparoscopy -- risk -- urinary catheter
Patients -- Safety measures -- Periodicals
Medicine -- Practice -- Safety measures -- Periodicals
Medical errors -- Prevention -- Periodicals
610.289 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.lww.com/journalpatientsafety/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000612 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1549-8417
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5030.008000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 18694.xml