Comparison of Surface Subsidence Measured by Airborne and Satellite InSAR Over Permafrost Areas Near Yellowknife Canada. Issue 6 (22nd June 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Xu, Xingyu; Liu, Lin; Schaefer, Kevin; Michaelides, Roger
• Is Part Of: Earth and space science. Volume 8:Issue 6(2021)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2021-06-22
• Subjects: UAVSAR -- satellite InSAR -- surface subsidence -- permafrost -- Arctic and Boreal; Space sciences -- Periodicals; Geophysics -- Periodicals; 500.5
• DOI: 10.1029/2020EA001631
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2333-5084

Abstract

Abstract: In addition to spaceborne Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR), airborne data such as those obtained by the Uninhabited Aerial Vehicle Synthetic Aperture Radar (UAVSAR) have also been utilized to measure surface subsidence in permafrost areas in recent years. Motivated by the integration of multiplatform InSAR data, we generated two UAVSAR interferograms and one Advanced Land Observing Satellite (ALOS)‐2 L‐band interferogram over a permafrost area near Yellowknife, Canada, then compared the surface subsidence in the thaw seasons of 2017. The correlation coefficient and the root mean square error (RMSE) of subsidence difference are calculated to compare the airborne and spaceborne InSAR measurements. The results demonstrate that the two UAVSAR measurements are self‐consistent, with the correlation coefficient between independent airborne measurements ∼0.7. While the RMSE of the difference between surface subsidence measured by UAVSAR and ALOS2 is ∼2.0 cm, and the correlation coefficients are less than 0.41, that is, a noticeable deviation exists between the UAVSAR and ALOS2 results possibly due to different spatial resolution and the calibration processing of airborne and spaceborne InSAR data. In addition, both UAVSAR and ALOS2 interferograms show larger surface subsidence within taiga needleleaf forest regions than in regions of other biome types (including needleleaf forest, shrubland, and grassland). The results demonstrate that a scheme for the elimination of systematic differences needs to be developed before merging multisource InSAR results. This intercomparison will provide valuable insights for narrowing the gap between radar‐based measurements and planning the integration of airborne and satellite InSAR measurements in permafrost environments. Key Points: We compare the seasonal subsidence derived from airborne and satellite InSAR measurements Two UAVSAR interferograms are self‐consistent while a significant deviation exists between the UAVSAR and ALOS2 results We discuss the difference and the potential combination use of spaceborne and airborne InSAR to improve subsidence measurements over permafrost regions