Improved prediction of chemoresistance in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma through a new interim positron emission tomography-computed tomography evaluation model. (3rd June 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Xie, Wei; Liu, Meng-Ke; Jiang, Xu-Feng; Gao, Xiao-Dong; Li, Biao; Wang, Li; Zhao, Wei-Li
• Is Part Of: Acta oncologica. Volume 60:Number 6(2021)
• Page Start: 735
• Page End: 743
• Publication Date: 2021-06-03
• Subjects: Modified-Deauville -- interim PET/CT -- chemoresistance -- diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; Oncology -- Periodicals; Cancer -- Treatment -- Periodicals; 616.992
• DOI: 10.1080/0284186X.2021.1894477
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0284-186X

Abstract

Abstract: Objectives: The positron emission tomography (PET) could predict the prognosis of DLBCL patients, but the exact procedure on interim PET (iPET) to determine chemoresistant patients remains elusive. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 593 newly diagnosed DLBCL patients uniformly treated with R-CHOP regimen. Among them, 352 patients diagnosed from August 2010 to December 2016 were included in the test cohort and 241 patients diagnosed from January 2017 to December 2019 were included in the validation cohort. The iPET was evaluated with Deauville criteria and ΔSUVmax method. The reduction of maximal SUV between baseline and after 4 cycles of chemotherapy were defined as ΔSUVmax. The survival functions were depicted using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. Results: Patients with iPET Deauville 4 had heterogeneous outcome and end of treatment complete response rates (eCRR). Combined Deauville with ΔSUVmax method, we proposed a modified-Deauville model: patients with Deauville 4 and ΔSUVmax > 70%, as well as those with Deauville 1–3, were reclassified into the modified-Deauville negative group, while patients with Deauville 4 and ΔSUVmax ≤ 70%, as well as those with Deauville 5, into the modified-Deauville positive group. In the test cohort, 3-year PFS, OS and eCRR of modified-Deauville negative group were 80.2%, 89.9% and 91.8%, significantly higher than those of positive group (12.5%, 27.3% and 29.2%, p ≤ .001). Similar results were found in the validation cohort, that 3-year PFS, OS and eCRR were 87.8%, 95.4%, 96.3% in modified-Deauville negative group, and 27.4%, 32.5%, 13.5% in positive group. Through modified-Deauville model, patients in iPET positive group had very low eCRR and were resistant to conventional chemotherapy. Conclusions: The modified-Deauville model could better distinguish DLBCL patients with poor response to chemotherapy. Accordingly, these patients could be recognized early and provided with alternative therapeutic agents, which might improve the clinical outcome of refractory DLBCL patients.