Does Operative Intervention Provide Early Pain Relief for Patients With Unilateral Sacral Fractures and Minimal or No Displacement?. Issue 12 (December 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Does Operative Intervention Provide Early Pain Relief for Patients With Unilateral Sacral Fractures and Minimal or No Displacement?. Issue 12 (December 2019)
- Main Title:
- Does Operative Intervention Provide Early Pain Relief for Patients With Unilateral Sacral Fractures and Minimal or No Displacement?
- Authors:
- Tornetta, Paul
Lowe, Jason A.
Agel, Julie
Mullis, Brian H.
Jones, Clifford B.
Teague, David
Kempton, Laurence
Brown, Krista
Friess, Darin
Miller, Anna N.
Spitler, Clay A.
Kubiak, Erik
Gary, Joshua L.
Leighton, Ross
Morshed, Saam
Vallier, Heather A. - Abstract:
- Abstract : Objectives: To compare pain after operative versus nonoperative pelvic ring injuries with unilateral sacral fractures. Design: Prospective, multicenter, observational. Setting: Sixteen trauma centers. Patients/Participants: Skeletally mature patients with pelvic ring injury and minimally displaced unilateral zone 1 or 2 sacral fractures and without anteroposterior compression injuries. Main Outcome Measurements: Pelvic displacement was documented on injury plain radiographs and computed tomography scans; a 10 point Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was used to evaluate pain was obtained in the anterior and posterior pelvic ring during the time of union (12 weeks). Results: One hundred ninety-four patients with unilateral sacral fractures displaced less than 5 mm, mean age of 38.7, and mean Injury Severity Score of 14.5 were included. Ninety-nine percent had lateral compression injuries, and 62% were in zone 1. Seventy-four percent were treated nonoperatively. Nonoperative patients had more zone 1 fractures (71%, P = 0.004). Nonoperative patients reported mean VAS 2.7 points higher in the posterior pelvis ( P = 0.01) and 1.9 points higher anteriorly ( P = 0.11) 24 hours after injury compared with patients treated operatively. After 3 months, nonoperative patients reported higher VAS scores than operative patients: 4.0 versus 2.9 posteriorly ( P = 0.019) and 3.2 versus 2.3 anteriorly ( P = 0.035). Conclusions: For sacrum fractures with minimal or no displacement, slightAbstract : Objectives: To compare pain after operative versus nonoperative pelvic ring injuries with unilateral sacral fractures. Design: Prospective, multicenter, observational. Setting: Sixteen trauma centers. Patients/Participants: Skeletally mature patients with pelvic ring injury and minimally displaced unilateral zone 1 or 2 sacral fractures and without anteroposterior compression injuries. Main Outcome Measurements: Pelvic displacement was documented on injury plain radiographs and computed tomography scans; a 10 point Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was used to evaluate pain was obtained in the anterior and posterior pelvic ring during the time of union (12 weeks). Results: One hundred ninety-four patients with unilateral sacral fractures displaced less than 5 mm, mean age of 38.7, and mean Injury Severity Score of 14.5 were included. Ninety-nine percent had lateral compression injuries, and 62% were in zone 1. Seventy-four percent were treated nonoperatively. Nonoperative patients had more zone 1 fractures (71%, P = 0.004). Nonoperative patients reported mean VAS 2.7 points higher in the posterior pelvis ( P = 0.01) and 1.9 points higher anteriorly ( P = 0.11) 24 hours after injury compared with patients treated operatively. After 3 months, nonoperative patients reported higher VAS scores than operative patients: 4.0 versus 2.9 posteriorly ( P = 0.019) and 3.2 versus 2.3 anteriorly ( P = 0.035). Conclusions: For sacrum fractures with minimal or no displacement, slight differences in the VAS were noted within 24 hours after injury or surgery, but limited differences were seen at 3 months for either operatively treated minimally or undisplaced sacrum fractures. It is unknown whether this represents clinical relevance. These differences were below the minimally important clinical difference for VAS scores for other orthopaedic conditions. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of orthopaedic trauma. Volume 33:Issue 12(2019)
- Journal:
- Journal of orthopaedic trauma
- Issue:
- Volume 33:Issue 12(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 33, Issue 12 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 33
- Issue:
- 12
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0033-0012-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2019-12
- Subjects:
- sacrum fracture -- pelvis -- pain -- pelvic ring injury -- indications
Orthopedics -- Periodicals
Wounds and injuries -- Periodicals
Orthopedics -- Periodicals
Wounds and Injuries -- therapy -- Periodicals
Periodicals
617.47044 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.lww.com/jorthotrauma/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://www.jorthotrauma.com ↗
http://cufts2.lib.sfu.ca/CJDB/BVAS/journal/149202 ↗
http://gateway.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&MODE=ovid&PAGE=toc&D=ovft&AN=00005131-000000000-00000 ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001578 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0890-5339
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5027.675000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 18911.xml