Effect of anti-inflammatory compounds or antibiotic administration on receiving performance and physiological responses of transported heifers. (1st February 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wu, Xin; Cao, Na; Zhou, Zhenming; Beck, Paul A; Wu, Hao; Meng, Qingxiang
• Is Part Of: Journal of animal science. Volume 98:Number 2(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-02-01
• Subjects: acute-phase proteins -- astragalus polysaccharide -- receiving performance -- transported heifers -- tulathromycin -- yeast product; Livestock -- Periodicals; Livestock; Electronic journals; Periodicals; 636.005
• DOI: 10.1093/jas/skaa036
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0021-8812

Abstract

Abstract: The objectives of this experiment was to evaluate the effects of products with anti-inflammatory properties (yeast product [YEA ; 20 g/heifer daily] or astragalus polysaccharide [APS ; 20 g/heifer daily]) or an antibiotic (TUL, tulathromycin; 0.025 mL/kg body weight [BW] ) on receiving performance and stress responses of transported heifers. Angus heifers ( n = 80) were ranked by BW (315 ± 6 kg) and assigned to one of four treatments (five pens per treatment, four heifers per pen) 7 d before shipping 1, 400 km (day −7): 1) fed a basal diet of ad libitum hay and concentrate supplement (CON ) from day −7 to day 29; 2) YEA in supplemental concentrate from day −7 to day 7 (YEA); 3) APS in supplemental concentrate from day −7 to day 7 (APS); 4) administration of TUL at loading for shipping (day 0; TUL). Upon arrival at the receiving facility (day 1), heifers within each treatment were ranked by BW and assigned to 20 feedlot pens in the same manner as pre-transport. Daily dry matter intake (DMI ) was recorded from day 1 to day 28. Full BW was recorded on days −7, −1, 0, 1, 28, and 29. Blood samples were collected on days −7, −1, 1, 4, 7, 14, and 28. Over the receiving period, average daily gain (ADG ) and gain: feed did not differ ( P ≥ 0.19) for YEA, APS, and TUL, which were greater ( P ≤ 0.01) than CON. Average daily gain was also lower ( P < 0.01) for CON vs. YEA, APS, and TUL from day −7 to day 28. During the first week of receiving, hay, concentrate, and total DMI were lower ( P < 0.01) in CON than the YEA, APS, and TUL, but did not differ ( P ≥ 0.13) among these three groups. Hay and total DMI were still lower ( P < 0.01) in CON vs. TUL in the second week. Total DMI was greater ( P = 0.01) for TUL vs. YEA, and greater ( P < 0.01) for YEA vs. CON. Serum nonesterified fatty acid concentrations were greater ( P ≤ 0.05) for CON and TUL vs. YEA and APS on day 1. Plasma cortisol concentrations were greater ( P ≤ 0.05) for YEA and CON vs. APS and TUL on day 1. Serum tumor necrosis factor-α concentrations were lower ( P ≤ 0.05) for APS vs. CON, YEA, and TUL on days 1 and 4. Plasma haptoglobin concentrations were greater ( P ≤ 0.05) for CON vs. YEA, APS, and TUL on days 1 and 4, greater ( P ≤ 0.05) for YEA, APS vs. TUL on day 1, and greater ( P = 0.03) for YEA vs. TUL on day 4. Plasma ceruloplasmin concentrations were greater ( P ≤ 0.05) for CON vs. YEA, APS and TUL vs. APS on days 1, 4, and 7. In conclusion, YEA, APS, and TUL modulated the physiological stress responses and alleviated the performance losses caused by long-distance transportation.