How functionally diverse are fish in the deep? A comparison of fish communities in deep and shallow‐water systems. Issue 7 (5th May 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Carrington, Victoria G.; Papa, Yvan; Beese, Chelsey M.; Hall, Jessica; Covain, Raphaël; Horn, Peter; Ladds, Monique A.; Rogers, Alice
• Editors: Yeo, Darren
• Is Part Of: Diversity & distributions. Volume 27:Issue 7(2021)
• Page Start: 1208
• Page End: 1223
• Publication Date: 2021-05-05
• Subjects: categorical traits -- deep‐sea -- diversity metrics -- ecosystem functions -- functional diversity -- fuzzy coding -- New Zealand -- null models -- trait analysis; Biodiversity -- Periodicals; Biodiversity conservation -- Periodicals; 577
• DOI: 10.1111/ddi.13268
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1366-9516

Abstract

Abstract: Aim: Functional diversity metrics inform how species' traits relate to ecosystem functions, useful for quantifying how exploitation and disturbance impact ecosystems. We compare the functional diversity of entire fish communities in a shallow‐water region with a deep‐sea region for further insight into the differences between these ecosystem types. Location: The regions compared in this study were selected to represent a shallow‐water coastal region, Tasman and Golden Bays (TBGB), and a deep‐sea region, Chatham Rise (CR), in New Zealand. Methods: Functional diversity was assessed using four metrics: functional richness, evenness, divergence and dispersion. We compared these metrics across four key functions: habitat use, feeding, locomotion and life history. Results: Our results showed that overall, the shallow‐water and deep‐sea ecosystems had equal diversity. When focusing on the four ecological functions, the two ecosystems exhibited equal diversity metrics across most analyses. Of the significantly different results, the deep‐sea had higher functional richness for habitat use and locomotion traits, lower functional dispersion for feeding and lower functional evenness for life history. Main conclusions: Differences across the functions highlight higher diversity of habitat utilization by deep‐sea fish, while lower diversity in feeding suggests deep‐sea fish tend towards generalist diets, likely driven by low food availability. Deep‐sea fish displayed an increased range of locomotive traits in our analyses, but this conflicts with existing evidence and warrants further study. Life‐history results suggest deep‐sea fish exhibit higher clustering of traits, indicating potential under‐utilization of life‐history strategies in the deep‐sea. Our results demonstrate that although deep‐sea fish communities have similar levels of diversity to shallow‐water communities, the traits that structure this diversity differ, and therefore, the systems may respond to exploitation differently.