Small Enhancement of Bimanual Typing Performance after 20 Sessions of tDCS in Healthy Young Adults. (1st July 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sevilla-Sanchez, Marta; Hortobágyi, Tibor; Fogelson, Noa; Iglesias-Soler, Eliseo; Carballeira, Eduardo; Fernandez-del-Olmo, Miguel
• Is Part Of: Neuroscience. Volume 466(2021)
• Page Start: 26
• Page End: 35
• Publication Date: 2021-07-01
• Subjects: non-invasive brain stimulation -- transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) -- motor learning -- long-term -- motor skills; Neurochemistry -- Periodicals; Neurophysiology -- Periodicals; Neurology -- Periodicals; Neurochimie -- Périodiques; Neurophysiologie -- Périodiques; Neurochemistry; Neurophysiology; Electronic journals; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 612.8
• DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2021.05.001
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0306-4522

Abstract

Highlights: The effect of tDCS decreased the participants' errors in a submaximal speed typing task. The application of tDCS mainly reduced errors during the first 10 intervention sessions. Non-invasive brain stimulation over M1 appear no effects on long-term motor performance. Long-term applied tDCS seems to be a safe and painless technique for healthy participants. Abstract: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique that may improve motor learning. However, the long-term effects of tDCS have not been explored, and the ecological validity of the evaluated tasks was limited. To determine whether 20 sessions of tDCS over the primary motor cortex (M1) would enhance the performance of a complex life motor skill, i.e., typing, in healthy young adults. Healthy young adults ( n = 60) were semi-randomly assigned to three groups: the tDCS group ( n = 20) received anodal tDCS over M1; the SHAM group ( n = 20) received sham tDCS, both while performing a typing task; and the Control group (CON, n = 20) only performed the typing task. Typing speed and errors at maximum (mTT) and submaximal (iTT) speeds were measured before training, and after 10 and 20 sessions of tDCS. Every subject increased maximum typing speed after 10 and 20 tDCS sessions, with no significant differences ( p > 0.05) between the groups. The number of errors at submaximal rates decreased significantly ( p < 0.05) by 4% after 10 tDCS sessions compared with the 3% increase in the SHAM and the 2% increase in the CON groups. Between the 10th and 20th tDCS sessions, the number of typing errors increased significantly in all groups. While anodal tDCS reduced typing errors marginally, such performance-enhancing effects plateaued after 10 sessions without any further improvements in typing speed. These findings suggest that long-term tDCS may not have functionally relevant effects on healthy young adults' typing performance.