Process intensification by frontal chromatography: Performance comparison of resin and membrane adsorber for monovalent antibody aggregate removal. Issue 3 (11th December 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Vogg, Sebastian; Pfeifer, Felix; Ulmer, Nicole; Morbidelli, Massimo
• Is Part Of: Biotechnology and bioengineering. Volume 117:Issue 3(2020)
• Page Start: 662
• Page End: 672
• Publication Date: 2019-12-11
• Subjects: aggregate -- antibody -- frontal chromatography -- membrane adsorber -- resin; Biotechnology -- Periodicals; Bioengineering -- Periodicals; 660.6
• DOI: 10.1002/bit.27235
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0006-3592

Abstract

Abstract: Aggregates are amongst the most important product‐related impurities to be removed during the downstream processing of antibodies due to their potential immunogenicity. Traditional operations use cation‐exchange resins in bind‐elute mode for their separation. However, frontal analysis is emerging as an alternative. In this study, a three‐step process development for a membrane adsorber and a resin material is carried out, allowing the comparison between the stationary phases. Based on a screening study, optimal loading conditions are determined, which show that weak binding is favored on the membrane and strong binding on the resin. Transfer of these findings to breakthrough experiments shows that at 99% pool purity the yield is higher for the membrane, while the resin can be loaded twice as high, exceeding yields of 85%. For the investigated antibody and based on a given regeneration protocol, the productivity of the two phases is similar, ranging around 200 g/(L·h). Due to the higher loading, the resin requires about one‐third less buffer than the membrane. Furthermore, the implementation of a wash step after loading allows to further increase yield by about 5%. In comparison to a generic bind‐elute process, productivity and buffer consumption are improved by an order of magnitude. Abstract : Process performance of frontal chromatography for the removal of antibody aggregates was compared on a membrane adsorber and a column. Based on a three‐step process development, optimal process parameters were established for each stationary phase. Under a 99 % purity constraint, it was found that both stationary phases allow yields above 85 % and a ten‐fold increased productivity with respect to bind‐elute chromatography.