The new kid on the block: immigrant males win big whereas females pay fitness cost after dispersal. (12th December 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Martinig, April Robin; McAdam, Andrew G.; Dantzer, Ben; Lane, Jeffrey E.; Coltman, David W.; Boutin, Stan
• Editors: Coulson, Tim
• Is Part Of: Ecology letters. Volume 23:Number 3(2020)
• Page Start: 430
• Page End: 438
• Publication Date: 2019-12-12
• Subjects: Competition -- cooperation -- dispersal -- fitness -- inbreeding -- kin selection -- local resource enhancement -- philopatry -- sex‐biased dispersal -- Tamiasciurus hudsonicus; Ecology -- Periodicals; 577
• DOI: 10.1111/ele.13436
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1461-023X

Abstract

Abstract: Dispersal is nearly universal; yet, which sex tends to disperse more and their success thereafter depends on the fitness consequences of dispersal. We asked if lifetime fitness differed between residents and immigrants (successful between‐population dispersers) and their offspring using 29 years of monitoring from North American red squirrels ( Tamiasciurus hudsonicus ) in Canada. Compared to residents, immigrant females had 23% lower lifetime breeding success (LBS), while immigrant males had 29% higher LBS. Male immigration and female residency were favoured. Offspring born to immigrants had 15–43% lower LBS than offspring born to residents. We conclude that immigration benefitted males, but not females, which appeared to be making the best of a bad lot. Our results are in line with male‐biased dispersal being driven by local mate competition and local resource enhancement, while the intergenerational cost to immigration is a new complication in explaining the drivers of sex‐biased dispersal. Abstract : Our results are in line with male‐biased dispersal being driven by local mate competition and local resource enhancement, while the intergenerational cost to immigration is a new complication in explaining the drivers of sex‐biased dispersal.