Concordance with antibiotic guidelines in Australian primary care: A retrospective study of prior‐to‐hospital therapy. Issue 12 (1st October 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Concordance with antibiotic guidelines in Australian primary care: A retrospective study of prior‐to‐hospital therapy. Issue 12 (1st October 2019)
- Main Title:
- Concordance with antibiotic guidelines in Australian primary care: A retrospective study of prior‐to‐hospital therapy
- Authors:
- O'Keefe, Caitlan
Thompson, Angus
McKenzie, Duncan
Lee, Kenneth - Abstract:
- Summary: Background: Appropriate antibiotic prescribing improves patient outcomes and mitigates antimicrobial resistance. As the majority of antibiotics are used in the community, rational prescribing in this setting is of paramount importance. Objectives: We aimed to (1) evaluate the concordance of community antibiotic prescribing with guidelines for three common infection types among patients who presented to hospital, and (2) identify relationships between guideline concordance and patient‐related factors. Methods: Medical records were evaluated from the Royal Hobart Hospital (Tasmania, Australia) for patients presenting with respiratory tract, urinary tract or skin and soft tissue infections within a 12‐month period. Prior‐to‐hospital antibiotic therapy was assessed for concordance with prescribing guidelines based on presenting diagnosis. Concordance was assessed against first‐line recommendations in the Australian Therapeutic Guidelines ‐ Antibiotic, based on drug choice, dose, frequency and patient factors. Descriptive statistics were performed to address Objective 1. Multivariate logistic regressions were conducted to address Objective 2 with the following independent variables: infection type, age, allergies, diabetes status, gender and residential setting. Results: A total of 285 patient records were eligible for data analysis; 28.8% (n = 82) were fully guideline concordant. The most common reason for non‐concordance was inappropriate drug choice (n = 143, 50.2%).Summary: Background: Appropriate antibiotic prescribing improves patient outcomes and mitigates antimicrobial resistance. As the majority of antibiotics are used in the community, rational prescribing in this setting is of paramount importance. Objectives: We aimed to (1) evaluate the concordance of community antibiotic prescribing with guidelines for three common infection types among patients who presented to hospital, and (2) identify relationships between guideline concordance and patient‐related factors. Methods: Medical records were evaluated from the Royal Hobart Hospital (Tasmania, Australia) for patients presenting with respiratory tract, urinary tract or skin and soft tissue infections within a 12‐month period. Prior‐to‐hospital antibiotic therapy was assessed for concordance with prescribing guidelines based on presenting diagnosis. Concordance was assessed against first‐line recommendations in the Australian Therapeutic Guidelines ‐ Antibiotic, based on drug choice, dose, frequency and patient factors. Descriptive statistics were performed to address Objective 1. Multivariate logistic regressions were conducted to address Objective 2 with the following independent variables: infection type, age, allergies, diabetes status, gender and residential setting. Results: A total of 285 patient records were eligible for data analysis; 28.8% (n = 82) were fully guideline concordant. The most common reason for non‐concordance was inappropriate drug choice (n = 143, 50.2%). Patients with the following characteristics were less likely to receive concordant therapy: diabetes (OR = 0.3, 95% CI 0.1‐0.8, P = .02) and increasing age (OR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.98‐1.00, P = .04). Conclusions: Almost three‐quarters of patients received community‐initiated antibiotic therapy that was not fully guideline concordant. Antimicrobial stewardship interventions are urgently needed to improve guideline concordance for community‐initiated antibiotic therapy. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- International journal of clinical practice. Volume 73:Issue 12(2019)
- Journal:
- International journal of clinical practice
- Issue:
- Volume 73:Issue 12(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 73, Issue 12 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 73
- Issue:
- 12
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0073-0012-0000
- Page Start:
- n/a
- Page End:
- n/a
- Publication Date:
- 2019-10-01
- Subjects:
- Clinical medicine -- Periodicals
Medicine -- Periodicals
610.5 - Journal URLs:
- http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/loi/ijcp ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/openurl?genre=journal&eissn=1742-1241 ↗
http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1368-5031&site=1 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1742-1241 ↗
https://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijclp/ ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/ijcp.13427 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1368-5031
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4542.172160
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 17308.xml