Current diagnostic ECG criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy: is it time to change paradigm in the analysis of data?. Issue 2 (February 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Current diagnostic ECG criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy: is it time to change paradigm in the analysis of data?. Issue 2 (February 2020)
- Main Title:
- Current diagnostic ECG criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy
- Authors:
- Ricciardi, Danilo
Vetta, Giampaolo
Nenna, Antonio
Picarelli, Francesco
Creta, Antonio
Segreti, Andrea
Cavallaro, Camilla
Carpenito, Myriam
Gioia, Flavio
Di Belardino, Natale
Lusini, Mario
Chello, Massimo
Calabrese, Vito
Grigioni, Francesco - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background: Twelve-lead ECG represents the most common diagnostic tool in clinical cardiology and allows an immediate screening of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), but current criteria might have poor clinical usefulness in everyday clinical practice due to lack of sensitivity. Methods: The current study aims to review and compare the clinical performance of known ECG criteria of LVH in a real-life setting; 2134 patients had ECG and echocardiographic exams performed during the same hospitalization. All traces were retrospectively analysed, and the amplitudes of the waves were manually measured. Transthoracic echocardiography was considered as the gold standard to assess LVH. Results: LVH had a prevalence of 58%. Considering the diagnostic performance of ECG criteria for LVH, the Cornell voltage carried the best area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.678), while RaVF (R wave in aVF lead) had the poorer result (0.440). The R5/R6 criterion had the best sensitivity (60%), but with the worst specificity (37.4%). The 'Q or S aVR' had the best specificity (99.9%) but lacks sensitivity (0.80%). The Peguero Lo Presti criterion had a sensitivity of 42.3% and a specificity of 75.8%. The Cornell voltage and the Cornell product had similar area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values which were found to be significantly greater compared with other criteria. Conclusion: Current ECG criteria of LVH have low sensitivity despite an acceptableAbstract : Background: Twelve-lead ECG represents the most common diagnostic tool in clinical cardiology and allows an immediate screening of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), but current criteria might have poor clinical usefulness in everyday clinical practice due to lack of sensitivity. Methods: The current study aims to review and compare the clinical performance of known ECG criteria of LVH in a real-life setting; 2134 patients had ECG and echocardiographic exams performed during the same hospitalization. All traces were retrospectively analysed, and the amplitudes of the waves were manually measured. Transthoracic echocardiography was considered as the gold standard to assess LVH. Results: LVH had a prevalence of 58%. Considering the diagnostic performance of ECG criteria for LVH, the Cornell voltage carried the best area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.678), while RaVF (R wave in aVF lead) had the poorer result (0.440). The R5/R6 criterion had the best sensitivity (60%), but with the worst specificity (37.4%). The 'Q or S aVR' had the best specificity (99.9%) but lacks sensitivity (0.80%). The Peguero Lo Presti criterion had a sensitivity of 42.3% and a specificity of 75.8%. The Cornell voltage and the Cornell product had similar area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values which were found to be significantly greater compared with other criteria. Conclusion: Current ECG criteria of LVH have low sensitivity despite an acceptable specificity. Among these, Cornell voltage and Cornell product criteria were equally found to have a more accurate diagnostic performance compared with other criteria. To overcome the intrinsic limitations of the current ECG LVH criteria, a new paradigm in the analysis of electrocardiographic data might be necessary. Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of cardiovascular medicine. Volume 21:Issue 2(2020:Feb.)
- Journal:
- Journal of cardiovascular medicine
- Issue:
- Volume 21:Issue 2(2020:Feb.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 21, Issue 2 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 21
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0021-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2020-02
- Subjects:
- ECG -- left ventricular hypertrophy -- screening
Cardiology -- Periodicals
Cardiovascular system -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Cardiology -- Periodicals
Cardiovascular Diseases -- Periodicals
616.1005 - Journal URLs:
- http://gateway.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&MODE=ovid&PAGE=toc&D=ovft&AN=01244665-000000000-00000 ↗
http://www.jcardiovascularmedicine.com/pt/re/jcm/home.htm ↗
http://journals.lww.com/pages/default.aspx ↗ - DOI:
- 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000907 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1558-2027
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4954.867300
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 17302.xml