Lower-limb amputee ankle and hip kinetic response to an imposed error in mediolateral foot placement. Issue 15 (26th November 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Segal, Ava D.; Shofer, Jane B.; Klute, Glenn K.
• Is Part Of: Journal of biomechanics. Volume 48:Issue 15(2015)
• Page Start: 3982
• Page End: 3988
• Publication Date: 2015-11-26
• Subjects: Amputee -- Prosthesis -- Disturbance -- Coronal hip moment -- Ankle impulse; Animal mechanics -- Periodicals; Biomechanics -- Periodicals; Biomechanics -- Periodicals; Mécanique animale -- Périodiques; Biomécanique -- Périodiques; Electronic journals; 571.4305
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.09.014
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0021-9290

Abstract

Abstract: Maintaining balance while walking is challenging for lower limb amputees. The effect of prosthetic foot stiffness on recovery kinetics from an error in foot placement may inform prescription practice and lead to new interventions designed to improve balance. Ten unilateral transtibial amputees were fit with two prosthetic feet with different stiffness properties in random order. After a 3-week acclimation period, they returned to the lab for testing before switching feet. Twelve non-amputees also participated in a single data collection. While walking on an instrumented treadmill, we imposed a repeatable, unexpected medial or lateral disturbance in foot placement by releasing a burst of air at the ankle just before heel strike. Three-dimensional motion capture, ground reaction force and center of pressure (COP) data were collected for two steps prior, the disturbed step and three steps after the disturbance. During undisturbed walking, coronal ankle impulse was lower by 42% for amputees wearing a stiff compared to a compliant foot ( p =0.017); however, across steps, both prosthetic recovery patterns were similar compared to the sound limb and non-amputees. Peak coronal hip moment was 15–20% lower for both foot types during undisturbed walking ( p <0.001), with less change in response to the medial disturbance ( p <0.001) compared to the sound limb and non-amputees. Amputee prosthetic COP excursion was unaffected by the disturbance (2.4% change) compared to the sound limb (59% change; p <0.001) and non-amputees (55% change; p <0.001). These findings imply that a prosthetic foot–ankle system able to contribute to ankle kinetics may improve walking balance among amputees.