Measured vs. predicted site response at the Garner Valley Downhole Array considering shear wave velocity uncertainty from borehole and surface wave methods. Issue 113 (October 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Teague, David P.; Cox, Brady R.; Rathje, Ellen M.
• Is Part Of: Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering. Issue 113(2018)
• Page Start: 339
• Page End: 355
• Publication Date: 2018-10
• Subjects: Soil dynamics -- Periodicals; Earthquake engineering -- Periodicals; Sols -- Dynamique -- Périodiques; Génie parasismique -- Périodiques; 624.176205
• DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.05.031
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0267-7261

Abstract

Abstract: This paper compares measured and predicted site response at the Garner Valley Downhole Array (GVDA) using a wide range of shear wave velocity (Vs) profiles developed from both borehole methods and inversion of surface wave data. Only low amplitude ground motions, resulting in approximately linear-viscoelastic site response between the downhole accelerometer and the surface accelerometers, were considered in this study. Thus, uncertainties associated with the small-strain Vs profiles used for site response predictions play a considerable role in attempting to match the recorded site response and its associated variability. Prior to our study, two borehole Vs profiles extending into rock were available for the site. However, their predicted/theoretical transfer functions (TTFs) were quite different and in poor agreement with the measured/empirical transfer functions (ETFs). These differences provided motivation to collect and interpret an extensive set of active-source and passive-wavefield surface wave measurements in an attempt to develop deep Vs profiles for the site that might be used to more accurately model the measured site response and its associated variability. Suites of non-unique Vs profiles developed from inversion of the surface wave data visually exhibited considerable differences, yet their predicted TTFs matched the measured ETFs very well. These results provide further evidence that surface wave dispersion data and horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio curves represent an experimental "site signature" that can be used as a quantitative means of assessing whether candidate Vs profiles are appropriate for use in site response analyses. Highlights: Empirical transfer functions (ETF) computed at Garner Valley Dowhnole Array (GVDA) site. Theoretical transfer functions (TTFs) calculated for various Vs profiles. TTFs for Vs profiles from borehole testing and randomization poorly match ETF. TTFs for Vs profiles from surface wave inversion are in good agreement with ETF. Experimental dispersion and H/V data can be considered as a "site signature", which can aid in randomization.