An integrated approach for fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy MAIRCA. (January 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- An integrated approach for fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy MAIRCA. (January 2020)
- Main Title:
- An integrated approach for fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy MAIRCA
- Authors:
- Boral, Soumava
Howard, Ian
Chaturvedi, Sanjay K.
McKee, Kristoffer
Naikan, V.N.A. - Abstract:
- Graphical abstract: Highlights: A new fuzzy FMEA approach is proposed in this paper. Buckley's fuzzy AHP method is used to calculate the fuzzy weights of the risk factors. Modified fuzzy MAIRCA is used for risk-ranking of the failure modes. Proposed modified fuzzy MAIRCA has several advantages over the original one. The superiority of the integrated approach is elucidated by solving a benchmark example. Abstract: Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) is a proactive risk assessment technique, which has been widely used by engineers to meet the safety and reliability requirements of processes, products, structures, services, and systems. The major aim of the FMEA technique is to rank the failure modes according to their risk levels and subsequent actions are performed to eliminate/mitigate their consequences. In a typical FMEA, for each failure mode, three risk factors, namely severity (S), occurrence (O) and detection (D) are evaluated and a risk priority number (RPN) is estimated by multiplying these risk factors. In recent years a significant effort has been underway and different approaches have been proposed to improve FMEA, to overcome its several drawbacks. We notice that there is a significant amount of literature based on multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods, which have been solely aimed to improve the risk estimation process in FMEA by overcoming the drawbacks of the traditional FMEA technique. In this work, we propose a novel integrated MCDM approach byGraphical abstract: Highlights: A new fuzzy FMEA approach is proposed in this paper. Buckley's fuzzy AHP method is used to calculate the fuzzy weights of the risk factors. Modified fuzzy MAIRCA is used for risk-ranking of the failure modes. Proposed modified fuzzy MAIRCA has several advantages over the original one. The superiority of the integrated approach is elucidated by solving a benchmark example. Abstract: Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) is a proactive risk assessment technique, which has been widely used by engineers to meet the safety and reliability requirements of processes, products, structures, services, and systems. The major aim of the FMEA technique is to rank the failure modes according to their risk levels and subsequent actions are performed to eliminate/mitigate their consequences. In a typical FMEA, for each failure mode, three risk factors, namely severity (S), occurrence (O) and detection (D) are evaluated and a risk priority number (RPN) is estimated by multiplying these risk factors. In recent years a significant effort has been underway and different approaches have been proposed to improve FMEA, to overcome its several drawbacks. We notice that there is a significant amount of literature based on multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods, which have been solely aimed to improve the risk estimation process in FMEA by overcoming the drawbacks of the traditional FMEA technique. In this work, we propose a novel integrated MCDM approach by combining Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP) with the modified Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Ideal Real Comparative Analysis (modified FMAIRCA). At first, we calculate the fuzzy relative importance between the risk factors by using the FAHP method and then we use those importance values in our proposed modified FMAIRCA to rank the failure modes according to their risk level. Our modified FMAIRCA method is computationally inexpensive and is able to provide more viable decisions. We consider a benchmark example in FMEA domain to validate the ability of our integrated approach and highlight the usefulness of the same. Further, we compare the ranking result with other MCDM methods - FVIKOR, FCOPRAS, FMOORA, FMABAC, FTOPSIS and sensitivity analysis is also performed to highlight the robustness of the proposed approach. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Engineering failure analysis. Volume 108(2020)
- Journal:
- Engineering failure analysis
- Issue:
- Volume 108(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 108, Issue 2020 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 108
- Issue:
- 2020
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0108-2020-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2020-01
- Subjects:
- MCDM -- FMEA -- Risk assessment -- Fuzzy AHP -- Fuzzy MAIRCA
System failures (Engineering) -- Periodicals
Fracture mechanics -- Periodicals
Reliability (Engineering) -- Periodicals
Pannes -- Périodiques
Rupture, Mécanique de la -- Périodiques
Fiabilité -- Périodiques
Fracture mechanics
Reliability (Engineering)
System failures (Engineering)
Periodicals
Electronic journals
620.112 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/13506307 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.104195 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1350-6307
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3760.991000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 17276.xml