Developing clinical indicators for oncology: the inaugural cancer care indicator set for the Australian Council on Healthcare Standards. Issue 11 (30th May 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Developing clinical indicators for oncology: the inaugural cancer care indicator set for the Australian Council on Healthcare Standards. Issue 11 (30th May 2021)
- Main Title:
- Developing clinical indicators for oncology: the inaugural cancer care indicator set for the Australian Council on Healthcare Standards
- Authors:
- Segelov, Eva
Carrington, Christine
Aranda, Sanchia
Currow, David
Zalcberg, John R
Heriot, Alexander G
Mileshkin, Linda
Coutsouvelis, John
Millar, Jeremy L
Collopy, Brian T
Emery, Jon D
Zhang, Phoebe
Cooper, Simon
O'Kane, Carmel
Wale, Janet
Hancock, Stephen J
Sulkowski, Anthony
Bashford, John - Abstract:
- Abstract: Introduction: The Australian Council on Healthcare Standards (ACHS) sponsored an expert‐led, consensus‐driven, four‐stage process, based on a modified Delphi methodology, to determine a set of clinical indicators as quality measures of cancer service provision in Australia. This was done in response to requests from institutional health care providers seeking accreditation, which were additional and complementary to the existing radiation oncology set. The steering group members comprised multidisciplinary key opinion leaders and a consumer representative. Five additional participants constituted the stakeholder group, who deliberated on the final indicator set. Methods and recommendations: An initial meeting of the steering group scoped the high level nature of the desired set. In stage 2, 65 candidate indicators were identified by a literature review and a search of international metrics. These were ranked by survey, based on ease of data accessibility and collectability and clinical relevance. The top 27 candidates were debated by the stakeholder group and culled to a final set of 16 indicators. A user manual was created with indicators mapped to clinical codes. The indicator set was ratified by the Clinical Oncology Society of Australia and is now available for use by health care organisations participating in the ACHS Clinical Indicator Program. This inaugural cancer clinical indicator set covers high level assessment of various critical processes in cancerAbstract: Introduction: The Australian Council on Healthcare Standards (ACHS) sponsored an expert‐led, consensus‐driven, four‐stage process, based on a modified Delphi methodology, to determine a set of clinical indicators as quality measures of cancer service provision in Australia. This was done in response to requests from institutional health care providers seeking accreditation, which were additional and complementary to the existing radiation oncology set. The steering group members comprised multidisciplinary key opinion leaders and a consumer representative. Five additional participants constituted the stakeholder group, who deliberated on the final indicator set. Methods and recommendations: An initial meeting of the steering group scoped the high level nature of the desired set. In stage 2, 65 candidate indicators were identified by a literature review and a search of international metrics. These were ranked by survey, based on ease of data accessibility and collectability and clinical relevance. The top 27 candidates were debated by the stakeholder group and culled to a final set of 16 indicators. A user manual was created with indicators mapped to clinical codes. The indicator set was ratified by the Clinical Oncology Society of Australia and is now available for use by health care organisations participating in the ACHS Clinical Indicator Program. This inaugural cancer clinical indicator set covers high level assessment of various critical processes in cancer service provision in Australia. Regular reviews and updates will ensure usability. Changes in management as a result of this statement: This is the inaugural indicator set for cancer care for use across Australia and internationally under the ACHS Clinical Indicator Program. Multidisciplinary involvement through a modified Delphi process selected indicators representing both generic and specific aspects of care across the cancer journey pathway and will provide a functional tool to compare health care delivery across multiple settings. It is anticipated that this will drive continual improvement in cancer care provision. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Medical journal of Australia. Volume 214:Issue 11(2021)
- Journal:
- Medical journal of Australia
- Issue:
- Volume 214:Issue 11(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 214, Issue 11 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 214
- Issue:
- 11
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0214-0011-0000
- Page Start:
- 528
- Page End:
- 531
- Publication Date:
- 2021-05-30
- Subjects:
- Quality of health care -- Quality assurance -- health care -- Health status indicators -- Cancer
Medicine -- Periodicals
Medicine
Médecine -- Périodiques
Medicine
Periodical
Periodicals
Electronic journals
610 - Journal URLs:
- https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/13265377 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.5694/mja2.51087 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0025-729X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5529.000000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 17243.xml