Comparison between epidural and intravenous analgesia effects on disease-free survival after colorectal cancer surgery: a randomised multicentre controlled trial. (July 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Falk, Wiebke; Magnuson, Anders; Eintrei, Christina; Henningsson, Ragnar; Myrelid, Pär; Matthiessen, Peter; Gupta, Anil
• Is Part Of: British journal of anaesthesia. Volume 127:Number 1(2021)
• Page Start: 65
• Page End: 74
• Publication Date: 2021-07
• Subjects: colorectal cancer -- disease-free survival -- minimally invasive surgery -- open surgery -- patient-controlled intravenous analgesia -- recurrence -- thoracic epidural analgesia; Anesthesiology -- Periodicals; Anesthesia -- Periodicals; 617.9605
• DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.04.002
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0007-0912

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) has been suggested to improve survival after curative surgery for colorectal cancer compared with systemic opioid analgesia. The evidence, exclusively based on retrospective studies, is contradictory. Methods: In this prospective, multicentre study, patients scheduled for elective colorectal cancer surgery between June 2011 and May 2017 were randomised to TEA or patient-controlled i.v. analgesia (PCA) with morphine. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival at 5 yr after surgery. Secondary outcomes were postoperative pain, complications, length of stay (LOS) at the hospital, and first return to intended oncologic therapy (RIOT). Results: We enrolled 221 (110 TEA and 111 PCA) patients in the study, and 180 (89 TEA and 91 PCA) were included in the primary outcome. Disease-free survival at 5 yr was 76% in the TEA group and 69% in the PCA group; unadjusted hazard ratio (HR): 1.31 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.74–2.32), P =0.35; adjusted HR: 1.19 (95% CI: 0.61–2.31), P =0.61. Patients in the TEA group had significantly better pain relief during the first 24 h, but not thereafter, in open and minimally invasive procedures. There were no differences in postoperative complications, LOS, or RIOT between the groups. Conclusions: There was no significant difference between the TEA and PCA groups in disease-free survival at 5 yr in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer. Other than a reduction in postoperative pain during the first 24 h after surgery, no other differences were found between TEA compared with i.v. PCA with morphine.