Analytical evaluation and critical appraisal of early commercial SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays for routine use in a diagnostic laboratory. Issue 3 (3rd July 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Analytical evaluation and critical appraisal of early commercial SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays for routine use in a diagnostic laboratory. Issue 3 (3rd July 2021)
- Main Title:
- Analytical evaluation and critical appraisal of early commercial SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays for routine use in a diagnostic laboratory
- Authors:
- Cramer, A
Goodman, N
Cross, T
Gant, V
Dziadzio, M - Abstract:
- ABSTRACT: Background : The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance characteristics of early commercial SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays in mild and asymptomatic subjects to enable the selection of suitable immunoassays for routine diagnostic use. Methods : We used serum samples from a pre-COVID era patient cohort (n = 50, pre-December 2019), designated SARS-CoV-2 negative, and serum samples from a SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR-positive cohort (n = 90) taken > 14 days post-symptom onset (April–May 2020). Six ELISA assays were evaluated, including one confirmation assay to investigate antibody specificity. We also evaluated one point-of-care lateral flow device (LFIA) and one high throughput electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA). Results : The ELISA specificities ranged from 84% to 100%, with sensitivities ranging from 75.3% to 90.0%. The LFIA showed 100% specificity and 80% sensitivity using smaller sample numbers. The Roche CLIA immunoassay showed 100% specificity and 90.7% sensitivity. When used in conjunction, the Euroimmun nucleocapsid (NC) and spike-1 (S1) IgG ELISA assays had a sensitivity of 95.6%. The confirmation Dia.Pro IgG assay showed 92.6% of samples tested contained both NC and S1 antibodies, 32.7% had NC, S1 and S2 and 0% had either S1 or S2 only. Conclusions : The Roche assay and the Euroimmun NC and S1 assays had the best sensitivity overall. Combining the assays detecting NC and S1/S2 antibody increased diagnostic yield. These first-generation assaysABSTRACT: Background : The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance characteristics of early commercial SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays in mild and asymptomatic subjects to enable the selection of suitable immunoassays for routine diagnostic use. Methods : We used serum samples from a pre-COVID era patient cohort (n = 50, pre-December 2019), designated SARS-CoV-2 negative, and serum samples from a SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR-positive cohort (n = 90) taken > 14 days post-symptom onset (April–May 2020). Six ELISA assays were evaluated, including one confirmation assay to investigate antibody specificity. We also evaluated one point-of-care lateral flow device (LFIA) and one high throughput electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA). Results : The ELISA specificities ranged from 84% to 100%, with sensitivities ranging from 75.3% to 90.0%. The LFIA showed 100% specificity and 80% sensitivity using smaller sample numbers. The Roche CLIA immunoassay showed 100% specificity and 90.7% sensitivity. When used in conjunction, the Euroimmun nucleocapsid (NC) and spike-1 (S1) IgG ELISA assays had a sensitivity of 95.6%. The confirmation Dia.Pro IgG assay showed 92.6% of samples tested contained both NC and S1 antibodies, 32.7% had NC, S1 and S2 and 0% had either S1 or S2 only. Conclusions : The Roche assay and the Euroimmun NC and S1 assays had the best sensitivity overall. Combining the assays detecting NC and S1/S2 antibody increased diagnostic yield. These first-generation assays were not calibrated against reference material and the results were reported qualitatively. A portfolio of next-generation SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays will be necessary to investigate herd and vaccine-induced immunity. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- British journal of biomedical science. Volume 78:Issue 3(2021)
- Journal:
- British journal of biomedical science
- Issue:
- Volume 78:Issue 3(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 78, Issue 3 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 78
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0078-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- 141
- Page End:
- 146
- Publication Date:
- 2021-07-03
- Subjects:
- SARS-CoV-2 -- COVID-19 -- immunoassay -- ELISA -- analytical -- evaluation
Medical sciences -- Periodicals
Medical technology -- Periodicals
Biological Science Disciplines
Clinical Laboratory Techniques
Medical Laboratory Science
Anatomie pathologique
Medical sciences
Medical technology
Klinische chemie
Laboratoriumonderzoek
Periodicals
Periodicals
616.0756
610.07 M489L - Journal URLs:
- http://catalog.hathitrust.org/api/volumes/oclc/27845663.html ↗
http://www.ibms.org/index.cfm?method=publications.british_journal ↗
http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tbbs20?open=67&repitition=0 ↗
https://www.frontierspartnerships.org/journals/british-journal-of-biomedical-science ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1080/09674845.2020.1864108 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0967-4845
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 2306.730000
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 19929.xml