When plans are used to no effect: Considering implementation performance of greater Brisbane's compact activity centre policies. (September 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Limb, Mark; Grodach, Carl; Donehue, Paul; Mayere, Severine
• Is Part Of: Environment & planning. Volume 48:Number 7(2021)
• Page Start: 1860
• Page End: 1875
• Publication Date: 2021-09
• Subjects: Activity centres -- compact city -- plan evaluation -- plan performance -- land use planning; City planning -- Periodicals; Urban ecology (Sociology) -- Periodicals; 307.11605
• DOI: 10.1177/2399808320951583
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2399-8083

Abstract

Evaluations of plan implementation are typically conceived in terms of plan conformance (the degree to which outcomes align with planning intent) or plan performance (the degree to which decision makers apply the plan). In this research, we consider the relationship between performance–conformance by evaluating the implementation of compact activity centre policy in greater Brisbane. We examine two decades of changes to local land use planning regulations using content analysis, quantifications of permitted development intensity, and comparisons of actual land use changes with planned intent, to identify evidence of the use of metropolitan scale activity centre policy. We find that the activity centre policy performed well and was used as intended across the metropolitan area. However, despite strong performance, the policy conformed poorly in terms of achieving the expected outcomes. These findings highlight the importance of understanding plan implementation from both performance and conformance perspectives. While conformance evaluations are essential to connect planning intent to physical outcomes, understanding plan performance is also necessary to explain the results of conformance evaluations and whether conformance successes or failures were due to deficiencies with the plan itself or how the plan was used by key actors charged with its implementation.