Quantification of abdominal fat from computed tomography using deep learning and its association with electronic health records in an academic biobank. (12th February 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: MacLean, Matthew T; Jehangir, Qasim; Vujkovic, Marijana; Ko, Yi-An; Litt, Harold; Borthakur, Arijitt; Sagreiya, Hersh; Rosen, Mark; Mankoff, David A; Schnall, Mitchell D; Shou, Haochang; Chirinos, Julio; Damrauer, Scott M; Torigian, Drew A; Carr, Rotonya; Rader, Daniel J; Witschey, Walter R
• Is Part Of: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. Volume 28:Number 6(2021)
• Page Start: 1178
• Page End: 1187
• Publication Date: 2021-02-12
• Subjects: deep learning -- subcutaneous fat -- machine learning, Penn Medicine biobank, visceral fat -- body mass index; Medical informatics -- Periodicals; Information Services -- Periodicals; Medical Informatics -- Periodicals; Médecine -- Informatique -- Périodiques; Informatica; Geneeskunde; Informatique médicale; Computer network resources; Electronic journals; 610.285
• DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa342
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1067-5027

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: The objective was to develop a fully automated algorithm for abdominal fat segmentation and to deploy this method at scale in an academic biobank. Materials and Methods: We built a fully automated image curation and labeling technique using deep learning and distributive computing to identify subcutaneous and visceral abdominal fat compartments from 52, 844 computed tomography scans in 13, 502 patients in the Penn Medicine Biobank (PMBB). A classification network identified the inferior and superior borders of the abdomen, and a segmentation network differentiated visceral and subcutaneous fat. Following technical evaluation of our method, we conducted studies to validate known relationships with visceral and subcutaneous fat. Results: When compared with 100 manually annotated cases, the classification network was on average within one 5-mm slice for both the superior (0.4 ± 1.1 slice) and inferior (0.4 ± 0.6 slice) borders. The segmentation network also demonstrated excellent performance with intraclass correlation coefficients of 1.00 ( P < 2 × 10 -16 ) for subcutaneous and 1.00 ( P < 2 × 10 -16 ) for visceral fat on 100 testing cases. We performed integrative analyses of abdominal fat with the phenome extracted from the electronic health record and found highly significant associations with diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and renal failure, among other phenotypes. Conclusions: This work presents a fully automated and highly accurate method for the quantification of abdominal fat that can be applied to routine clinical imaging studies to fuel translational scientific discovery.