Comprehensive comparison of multiple renewable power generation methods: A combination analysis of life cycle assessment and ecological footprint. (September 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Gao, Chengkang; Zhu, Sulong; An, Nan; Na, Hongming; You, Huan; Gao, Chengbo
• Is Part Of: Renewable & sustainable energy reviews. Volume 147(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-09
• Subjects: Life cycle assessment -- Ecological footprint -- Wind power -- Solar photovoltaic power -- Biomass power -- Environmental impacts; AP acidification potential -- EP eutrophication potential -- GWP global warming potential -- HTP human toxicity potential -- LCA life cycle assessment -- POCP photochemical ozone creation potential; Renewable energy sources -- Periodicals; Power resources -- Periodicals; Énergies renouvelables -- Périodiques; Ressources énergétiques -- Périodiques; 333.794
• DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111255
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1364-0321

Abstract

Abstract: As the goal of carbon neutrality has been proposed consecutively, renewable energy sources such as wind, solar, and bioenergy are gaining close attention in national strategic and sustainable development plans. Along with the development of renewable energy generation technologies, it is necessary to assess the environmental burden of renewable energy generation. This study analyzed the economic and environmental benefits of wind power, solar power, and biomass power generation methods over their life cycle. This paper comprehensively assessed and compared their environmental impacts based on a life cycle assessment (LCA) framework combined with ecological footprint analysis for the three renewable energy generation in China, and compared the results with those of thermal power generation to make strategic suggestions for the renewable energy power generation industry. The results show that: (1) wind power consumed the least energy, only 6.80 kJ/kW·h, and had the lowest emissions of CO2, SO2, NOx and CO and environmental impact potential. (2) Based on the ecological footprint analysis on the provincial level, only Anhui, Shandong and Jiangsu provinces showed ecological deficits, while the other provinces were in ecological surplus, mostly above 50% of their ecological areas. (3) Compared to thermal power generation, which consumed 1170.911 kJ/kW·h, wind power was the only one of the three renewable energy achieved a reduction in energy consumption. Wind power is currently the most efficient way of generating renewable energy. Graphical abstract: Image 1 Highlights: The environmental and economic benefits of wind power, solar photovoltaic power, and biomass power generation were assessed. Life cycle assessment and ecological footprint were used as analytical methods. Wind power generation is preferred to solar photovoltaic and biomass power generation. Recommendations for the future development of the renewable energy generation industry are presented.