Efficacy and safety of antipsychotic treatments for schizophrenia: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials in Japan. (June 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Efficacy and safety of antipsychotic treatments for schizophrenia: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials in Japan. (June 2021)
- Main Title:
- Efficacy and safety of antipsychotic treatments for schizophrenia: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials in Japan
- Authors:
- Kishi, Taro
Ikuta, Toshikazu
Sakuma, Kenji
Okuya, Makoto
Iwata, Nakao - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: We examined the efficacy and safety of using antipsychotic medication for schizophrenia using only randomized trials of antipsychotic for schizophrenia conducted in Japan to avoid the biological and environmental heterogeneities caused by pooling data from various races and ethnicities. Methods: We searched for eligible studies on Embase, PubMed, and CENTRAL. Primary outcomes were improvement in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score (PANSS−T) and all-cause discontinuation. Other outcomes were improvement in PANSS subscale scores, discontinuation due to adverse events or inefficacy, and the incidence of 16 adverse events. Results: We calculated mean difference or risk ratios and 95% credible intervals. We identified 34 RCTs (6798 patients; mean study duration, 9.0 ± 4.24 weeks; proportion of male patients, 53.7%; mean age, 43.3 years). Besides placebo, studies included aripiprazole, asenapine, blonanserin, blonanserin-patch, brexpiprazole, clocapramine (no PANSS data), clozapine (no PANSS data), haloperidol, lurasidone, mosapramine, olanzapine, paliperidone, perospirone, quetiapine, and risperidone. Efficacy and safety profiles differed for antipsychotics used with schizophrenia in Japanese patients. All active treatments other than haloperidol and quetiapine outperformed placebo to improve PANSS−T. Asenapine, olanzapine, paliperidone, and risperidone outperformed placebo for all-cause discontinuation. Asenapine, blonanserin,Abstract: Background: We examined the efficacy and safety of using antipsychotic medication for schizophrenia using only randomized trials of antipsychotic for schizophrenia conducted in Japan to avoid the biological and environmental heterogeneities caused by pooling data from various races and ethnicities. Methods: We searched for eligible studies on Embase, PubMed, and CENTRAL. Primary outcomes were improvement in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score (PANSS−T) and all-cause discontinuation. Other outcomes were improvement in PANSS subscale scores, discontinuation due to adverse events or inefficacy, and the incidence of 16 adverse events. Results: We calculated mean difference or risk ratios and 95% credible intervals. We identified 34 RCTs (6798 patients; mean study duration, 9.0 ± 4.24 weeks; proportion of male patients, 53.7%; mean age, 43.3 years). Besides placebo, studies included aripiprazole, asenapine, blonanserin, blonanserin-patch, brexpiprazole, clocapramine (no PANSS data), clozapine (no PANSS data), haloperidol, lurasidone, mosapramine, olanzapine, paliperidone, perospirone, quetiapine, and risperidone. Efficacy and safety profiles differed for antipsychotics used with schizophrenia in Japanese patients. All active treatments other than haloperidol and quetiapine outperformed placebo to improve PANSS−T. Asenapine, olanzapine, paliperidone, and risperidone outperformed placebo for all-cause discontinuation. Asenapine, blonanserin, blonanserin-patch, haloperidol, lurasidone, mosapramine, olanzapine, paliperidone, and risperidone outperformed placebo to improve PANSS positive subscale scores. Aripiprazole, asenapine, blonanserin, blonanserin-patch, brexpiprazole, lurasidone, olanzapine, paliperidone, perospirone, and risperidone outperformed placebo to improve PANSS negative subscale scores. The confidence in evidence of most outcomes was low or very low. Conclusion: Our results are similar to those of previous network meta-analysis involving various races and ethnicities. Highlights: We examined the efficacy and safety of antipsychotics for Japanese schizophrenia. This study is a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Our results are similar to those of a previous study involving various human races. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of psychiatric research. Volume 138(2021)
- Journal:
- Journal of psychiatric research
- Issue:
- Volume 138(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 138, Issue 2021 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 138
- Issue:
- 2021
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0138-2021-0000
- Page Start:
- 444
- Page End:
- 452
- Publication Date:
- 2021-06
- Subjects:
- Japanese schizophrenia -- Antipsychotic -- Efficacy -- Safety -- Systematic review and network meta-analysis
Psychiatry -- Periodicals
Mental Disorders -- Periodicals
Maladies mentales -- Périodiques
Psychiatry
Electronic journals
Periodicals
616.89005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00223956 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.04.032 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0022-3956
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5043.250000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 17209.xml