Audit of low tidal volume ventilation in patients with hypoxic respiratory failure in a tertiary Australian intensive care unit. Issue 4 (July 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wilkins, David; Lane, Andrew S; Orde, Sam R
• Is Part Of: Anaesthesia and intensive care. Volume 49:Issue 4(2021)
• Page Start: 301
• Page End: 308
• Publication Date: 2021-07
• Subjects: Low tidal volume ventilation -- hypoxic respiratory failure -- mechanical ventilation -- acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) -- protocol adherence; Anesthesiology -- Periodicals; Intensive Care Units -- Periodicals; 617.96
• DOI: 10.1177/0310057X21993132
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0310-057X

Abstract

A low tidal volume ventilation (LTVV) strategy improves outcomes in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Subsequently, a LTVV strategy has become the standard of care for patients receiving mechanical ventilation. This strategy is poorly adhered to within intensive care units (ICUs). A retrospective analysis was conducted of prescribed tidal volumes in mechanically ventilated patients with hypoxic respiratory failure between April 2013 and March 2017. Data collection included the establishment of a new data-entry box for patient height in March 2016, aimed at assisting the calculation of LTVV. We reviewed 836 ICU admissions, comprising 19, 884 hours of ventilation. A total of 92% of admissions lacked patient height recording. When height was recorded, 54% of hours of ventilation were LTVV adherent. Non-LTVV hours for both groups involved higher tidal volumes (38%) rather than lower tidal volumes (8%). Non–LTVV-adherent hours were significantly ( P <0.001) more likely to be associated with patient mortality than LTVV-adherent hours were. For all hours of ventilation, mean tidal volume before March 2016 was significantly higher (496 (standard deviation (SD) 101) ml, compared to after March 2016 (451 (SD 107) ml, P <0.001, 95% confidence interval for true difference in means 42 to 48 ml). However, this trend gradually reversed over time. There was a clinician preference for multiples of 50 ml. There was poor adherence to LTVV strategy in patients with hypoxic respiratory failure, which was associated with an increase in patient mortality. An electronic medical record intervention was successful in producing change, but this was not sustainable over time. Clinician ventilation prescribing habits were based on numerical simplicity rather than evidence-based practice.