Effect of prucalopride on sildenafil‐induced inhibition of esophageal peristalsis in healthy adults. Issue 6 (9th November 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wong, Ming‐Wun; Liu, Tso‐Tsai; Yi, Chih‐Hsun; Hung, Jui‐Sheng; Lei, Wei‐Yi; Liang, Shu‐Wei; Orr, William C; Chen, Chien‐Lin
• Is Part Of: Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology. Volume 36:Issue 6(2021)
• Page Start: 1556
• Page End: 1561
• Publication Date: 2020-11-09
• Subjects: 5‐HT4 receptor agonist -- Esophagus -- Manometry -- Prucalopride -- Sildenafil; Gastroenterology -- Periodicals; Digestive organs -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Liver -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Gastroenterology -- Periodicals; Liver Diseases -- Periodicals; 616.33
• DOI: 10.1111/jgh.15305
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0815-9319

Abstract

Abstract: Background and Aim: Prucalopride, a high‐affinity 5‐hydroxytryptamine 4 receptor agonist, promotes esophageal peristalsis, while phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor sildenafil inhibits esophageal peristalsis. The present study was aimed to evaluate whether prucalopride would augment esophageal peristalsis subsequent to the application of sildenafil. Methods: Seventeen healthy adults underwent high‐resolution manometry by a catheter with one injection port located in the mid‐esophagus. Secondary peristalsis was assessed by rapid air injections after water swallows. Two sessions were randomly performed including acute administration of sildenafil 50 mg after pretreatment with prucalopride or the placebo. Results: The frequency of primary peristalsis subsequent to the administration of sildenafil was significantly increased by prucalopride ( P = 0.02). Prucalopride also significantly increased distal contractile integral of primary peristalsis subsequent to the administration of sildenafil ( P = 0.03). No difference in the frequency of secondary peristalsis subsequent to the administration of sildenafil for air injects of 10 mL ( P = 0.14) or 20 mL ( P = 0.21) was found between prucalopride and placebo. Prucalopride did not change distal contractile integral of secondary peristalsis subsequent to the administration of sildenafil for air injections of 10 mL ( P = 0.09) or 20 mL ( P = 0.12). Conclusions: Prucalopride modulates sildenafil‐induced inhibition of primary peristalsis by increasing its effectiveness and peristaltic wave amplitude. Our findings suggest that activation of 5‐hydroxytryptamine 4 receptors plays a role in mediating sildenafil‐induced inhibition of esophageal primary peristalsis rather than secondary peristalsis.