Increased Adhesive Potential of Antiphospholipid Syndrome Neutrophils Mediated by β2 Integrin Mac‐1. Issue 1 (27th December 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sule, Gautam; Kelley, William J.; Gockman, Kelsey; Yalavarthi, Srilakshmi; Vreede, Andrew P.; Banka, Alison L.; Bockenstedt, Paula L.; Eniola‐Adefeso, Omolola; Knight, Jason S.
• Is Part Of: Arthritis & rheumatology. Volume 72:Issue 1(2020)
• Page Start: 114
• Page End: 124
• Publication Date: 2019-12-27
• Subjects: Arthritis -- Periodicals; Rheumatism -- Periodicals; 616.72
• DOI: 10.1002/art.41057
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2326-5191

Abstract

Abstract : Objective: While the role of antiphospholipid antibodies in activating endothelial cells has been extensively studied, the impact of these antibodies on the adhesive potential of leukocytes has received less attention. This study was undertaken to investigate the extent to which antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) neutrophils adhere to resting endothelial cells under physiologic flow conditions and the surface molecules required for that adhesion. Methods: Patients with primary APS (n = 43), patients with a history of venous thrombosis but negative test results for antiphospholipid antibodies (n = 11), and healthy controls (n = 38) were studied. Cells were introduced into a flow chamber and perfused across resting human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). Surface adhesion molecules were quantified by flow cytometry. Neutrophil extracellular trap release (NETosis) was assessed in neutrophil‐HUVEC cocultures. Results: Upon perfusion of anticoagulated blood through the flow chamber, APS neutrophils demonstrated increased adhesion as compared to control neutrophils under conditions representative of either venous (n = 8; P < 0.05) or arterial (n = 15; P < 0.0001) flow. At the same time, APS neutrophils were characterized by up‐regulation of CD64, CEACAM1, β2 ‐glycoprotein I, and activated Mac‐1 on their surface (n = 12–18; P < 0.05 for all markers). Exposing control neutrophils to APS plasma or APS IgG resulted in increased neutrophil adhesion (n = 10–11; P < 0.0001) and surface marker up‐regulation as compared to controls. A monoclonal antibody specific for activated Mac‐1 reduced the adhesion of APS neutrophils in the flow‐chamber assay ( P < 0.01). The same monoclonal antibody reduced NETosis in neutrophil–HUVEC cocultures ( P < 0.01). Conclusion: APS neutrophils demonstrate increased adhesive potential, which is dependent upon the activated form of Mac‐1. In patients, this could lower the threshold for neutrophil–endothelium interactions, NETosis, and possibly thrombotic events.