Spatially explicit models of seasonal habitat for greater sage‐grouse at broad spatial scales: Informing areas for management in Nevada and northeastern California. Issue 1 (25th November 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Coates, Peter S.; Brussee, Brianne E.; Ricca, Mark A.; Severson, John P.; Casazza, Michael L.; Gustafson, Kit Benjamin; Espinosa, Shawn P.; Gardner, Scott C.; Delehanty, David J.
• Is Part Of: Ecology and evolution. Volume 10:Issue 1(2020)
• Page Start: 104
• Page End: 118
• Publication Date: 2019-11-25
• Subjects: Centrocercus urophasianus -- Great Basin -- resource selection function -- sage‐grouse -- seasonal mapping -- spatiotemporal variation; Ecology -- Periodicals; Evolution -- Periodicals; 577.05
• DOI: 10.1002/ece3.5842
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2045-7758

Abstract

Abstract: Defining boundaries of species' habitat across broad spatial scales is often necessary for management decisions, and yet challenging for species that demonstrate differential variation in seasonal habitat use. Spatially explicit indices that incorporate temporal shifts in selection can help overcome such challenges, especially for species of high conservation concern. Greater sage‐grouse Centrocercus urophasianus (hereafter, sage‐grouse), a sagebrush obligate species inhabiting the American West, represents an important case study because sage‐grouse exhibit seasonal habitat patterns, populations are declining in most portions of their range and are central to contemporary national land use policies. Here, we modeled spatiotemporal selection patterns for telemetered sage‐grouse across multiple study sites (1, 084 sage‐grouse; 30, 690 locations) in the Great Basin. We developed broad‐scale spatially explicit habitat indices that elucidated space use patterns (spring, summer/fall, and winter) and accounted for regional climatic variation using previously published hydrographic boundaries. We then evaluated differences in selection/avoidance of each habitat characteristic between seasons and hydrographic regions. Most notably, sage‐grouse consistently selected areas dominated by sagebrush with few or no conifers but varied in type of sagebrush selected by season and region. Spatiotemporal variation was most apparent based on availability of water resources and herbaceous cover, where sage‐grouse strongly selected upland natural springs in xeric regions but selected larger wet meadows in mesic regions. Additionally, during the breeding period in spring, herbaceous cover was selected strongly in the mesic regions. Lastly, we expanded upon an existing joint–index framework by combining seasonal habitat indices with a probabilistic index of sage‐grouse abundance and space use to produce habitat maps useful for sage‐grouse management. These products can serve as conservation planning tools that help predict expected benefits of restoration activities, while highlighting areas most critical to sustaining sage‐grouse populations. Our joint–index framework can be applied to other species that exhibit seasonal shifts in habitat requirements to help better guide conservation actions. Abstract : Sage‐grouse habitat and populations are declining across their range, which has put this species at the center of national land use policies in western North America. Our study provides valuable information of seasonally important areas for sage‐grouse populations for restoration and/or protection, as well as spatially explicit indices that can be integrated into quantitative planning tools to aid decisions related to sage‐grouse population restoration. We developed these spatially explicit products for populations within Nevada and California, which comprise the majority of sage‐grouse within the Great Basin.