High Strain‐Rate Material Model Validation for Laser Peening Simulation. Issue 13 (8th September 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Langer, Kristina; Olson, Steven; Brockman, Robert; Braisted, William; Spradlin, Thomas; Fitzpatrick, Michael E.
• Is Part Of: Journal of engineering. Volume 2015:Issue 13(2015)
• Page Start: 150
• Page End: 157
• Publication Date: 2015-09-08
• Subjects: laser beam applications -- finite element analysis -- internal stresses -- impact testing -- compressive testing; high‐strain material validation -- laser peening simulation -- finite element modeling -- residual stress prediction magnitude -- residual stress prediction sign -- high‐strain rate response -- Johnson‐ Cook formulation -- low‐strain rate material data -- split Hopkinson bar testing -- shock response prediction -- high‐impact flyer plate tests -- quasistatic compression testing -- FE simulations -- laser peen‐induced stress prediction; Engineering -- Periodicals; Engineering; Electronic journals; Periodicals; 620.005
• DOI: 10.1049/joe.2015.0118
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2051-3305

Abstract

Abstract : Finite element modeling can be a powerful tool for predicting residual stresses induced by laser peening; however the sign and magnitude of the stress predictions depend strongly on how the material model captures the high strain rate response. Although a Johnson‐Cook formulation is often employed, its suitability for modeling phenomena at very high strain rates has not been rigorously evaluated. In this paper, we address the effectiveness of the Johnson‐Cook model, with parameters developed from lower strain rate material data (∼10 3 s –1 ), to capture the higher strain rate response (∼10 5 –10 6 s –1 ) encountered during the laser peening process. Published Johnson‐Cook parameters extracted from split Hopkinson bar testing were used to predict the shock response of aluminum samples during high‐impact flyer plate tests. Additional quasi‐static and split Hopkinson bar tests were also conducted to study the model response in the lower strain rate regime. The overall objective of the research was to ascertain whether a material model based on conventional test data (quasi‐static compression testing and split Hopkinson bar measurements) can credibly be used in FE simulations to predict laser peen‐induced stresses.