Techno-economic comparison of solar organic Rankine cycle (ORC) and photovoltaic (PV) systems with energy storage. (December 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Patil, Vikas R.; Biradar, Vijay Irappa; Shreyas, R.; Garg, Pardeep; Orosz, Matthew S.; Thirumalai, N.C.
• Is Part Of: Renewable energy. Volume 113(2017)
• Page Start: 1250
• Page End: 1260
• Publication Date: 2017-12
• Subjects: Solar organic Rankine cycle -- Solar photovoltaic -- Techno-economic assessment -- Levelized cost of electricity -- Energy storage; Renewable energy sources -- Periodicals; Power resources -- Periodicals; Énergies renouvelables -- Périodiques; Ressources énergétiques -- Périodiques; 333.794
• DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2017.06.107
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0960-1481

Abstract

Abstract: In this work, we compare the technical and economic performance of a solar organic Rankine cycle (s-ORC) system with thermal energy storage (TES) and a solar photovoltaic (PV) system with battery storage at a capacity of 50 kWe . A two-dimensional variable space, comprising solar field area and storage capacity is swept for optimum operational zones of five performance indicators, namely annual energy generation, capacity utilization factor (CUF), capital cost, levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) and energy wasted. Minimum LCOE estimated for the s-ORC system was 0.19 USD/kWh with a CUF of 0.56. For the same CUF value, the PV system incurs a LCOE of at least 0.26 USD/kWh. The minimum LCOE of the PV system yields an attractive value of 0.12 USD/kWh, but it includes no battery storage and thus delivers a significantly lower CUF of 0.27. The results indicate that for achieving minimum LCOE, the operational zones of the two technologies differ in terms of storage requirement. The s-ORC technology potentially offers improved reliability of power supply through cost-effective TES. Visualization of annual energy and costs in the form of contour maps facilitates a holistic comparison of the two technologies with their storage options. Highlights: Solar field area & storage capacity was varied to assess impact on techno-economic performance of the two solar technologies. PV yielded a minimum LCOE of 0.12 USD/kWh and a CUF of 0.27. s-ORC yielded a minimum LCOE of 0.19 USD/kWh, with a CUF of 0.56. LCOE of PV, for a similar CUF is 0.26 USD/kWh. Results evince that s-ORC potentially offers reliable decentralized power supply due to cost-effectiveness of thermal storage.