Randomized clinical trial of stapler versus clamp-crushing transection in elective liver resection. Issue 3 (8th January 2014)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Randomized clinical trial of stapler versus clamp-crushing transection in elective liver resection. Issue 3 (8th January 2014)
- Main Title:
- Randomized clinical trial of stapler versus clamp-crushing transection in elective liver resection
- Authors:
- Rahbari, N N
Elbers, H
Koch, M
Vogler, P
Striebel, F
Bruckner, T
Mehrabi, A
Schemmer, P
Büchler, M W
Weitz, J - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: Various devices have been developed to facilitate liver transection and reduce blood loss in liver resections. None of these has proven superiority compared with the classical clamp-crushing technique. This randomized clinical trial compared the effectiveness and safety of stapler transection with that of clamp-crushing during open liver resection. Methods: Patients admitted for elective open liver resection between January 2010 and October 2011 were assigned randomly to stapler transection or the clamp-crushing technique. The primary endpoint was the total amount of intraoperative blood loss. Secondary endpoints included transection time, duration of operation, complication rates and resection margins. Results: A total of 130 patients were enrolled, 65 to clamp-crushing and 65 to stapler transection. There was no difference between groups in total intraoperative blood loss: median (i.q.r.) 1050 (525–1650) versus 925 (450–1425) ml respectively ( P = 0·279). The difference in total intraoperative blood loss normalized to the transection surface area was not statistically significant ( P = 0·092). Blood loss during parenchymal transection was significantly lower in the stapler transection group ( P = 0·002), as were the parenchymal transection time (mean(s.d.) 30(21) versus 9(7) min for clamp-crushing and stapler transection groups respectively; P < 0·001) and total duration of operation (mean(s.d.) 221(86) versus 190(85) min; P = 0·047). There were noAbstract: Background: Various devices have been developed to facilitate liver transection and reduce blood loss in liver resections. None of these has proven superiority compared with the classical clamp-crushing technique. This randomized clinical trial compared the effectiveness and safety of stapler transection with that of clamp-crushing during open liver resection. Methods: Patients admitted for elective open liver resection between January 2010 and October 2011 were assigned randomly to stapler transection or the clamp-crushing technique. The primary endpoint was the total amount of intraoperative blood loss. Secondary endpoints included transection time, duration of operation, complication rates and resection margins. Results: A total of 130 patients were enrolled, 65 to clamp-crushing and 65 to stapler transection. There was no difference between groups in total intraoperative blood loss: median (i.q.r.) 1050 (525–1650) versus 925 (450–1425) ml respectively ( P = 0·279). The difference in total intraoperative blood loss normalized to the transection surface area was not statistically significant ( P = 0·092). Blood loss during parenchymal transection was significantly lower in the stapler transection group ( P = 0·002), as were the parenchymal transection time (mean(s.d.) 30(21) versus 9(7) min for clamp-crushing and stapler transection groups respectively; P < 0·001) and total duration of operation (mean(s.d.) 221(86) versus 190(85) min; P = 0·047). There were no significant differences in postoperative morbidity ( P = 0·863) or mortality ( P = 0·684) between groups. Conclusion: Stapler transection is a safe technique but does not reduce intraoperative blood loss in elective liver resection compared with the clamp-crushing technique. Registration number: NCT01049607 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov ). Abstract : Stapler technique does not reduce blood loss … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- British journal of surgery. Volume 101:Issue 3(2014:Mar.)
- Journal:
- British journal of surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 101:Issue 3(2014:Mar.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 101, Issue 3 (2014)
- Year:
- 2014
- Volume:
- 101
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2014-0101-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- 200
- Page End:
- 207
- Publication Date:
- 2014-01-08
- Subjects:
- Surgery -- Periodicals
617.005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.bjs.co.uk/bjsCda/cda/microHome.do ↗
https://academic.oup.com/bjs# ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/bjs.9387 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0007-1323
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 2325.000000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 17129.xml