Diagnostic accuracy of MRI for identifying posterior element bone stress injury in athletes with low back pain: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. Issue 1 (2nd October 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Esh, Roy; Grødahl, Linn Helen J; Kerslake, Robert; Strachan, Kate; Spencer, Simon; Fawcett, Louise; Rushton, Alison; Heneghan, Nicola R
• Is Part Of: BMJ open sport & exercise medicine. Volume 6:Issue 1(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-10-02
• Subjects: Diagnosis -- Back injuries -- Evidence based review -- Athlete -- MRI; Sports medicine -- Periodicals; Exercise therapy -- Periodicals; 617.102705
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjsem-2020-000764
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2055-7647

Abstract

Abstract : Objective: To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of MRI for identifying posterior element bone stress injury (PEBSI) in the athletic population with low back pain (LBP). Study Design: A systematic review searched for published sources up until July 2020. Eligibility criteria: prospective cohort design, MRI diagnosis, adolescents/young adults, chief symptoms of LBP, PEBSI as the clinical diagnosis and SPECT-CT as reference standard. Risk of bias and overall quality were assessed using QUADAS-2 and GRADE, respectively. A narrative synthesis was conducted. Results: Four studies were included, with three included in the quantitative synthesis. Compared with SPECT-CT, two studies involving MRI demonstrated sensitivity and specificity of 80% and 100%, and 88% and 97%, respectively. Compared with CT, one study involving MRI demonstrated sensitivity and specificity of 97% and 91%, respectively. Risk of bias was moderate to high although consistency across studies was noted. Conclusion: Findings support further research to consider MRI as the modality of choice for diagnosing PEBSI. MRI was consistent with SPECT-CT for ruling-in PEBSI, but the clinical value of cases where MRI had false negatives remains uncertain due to possible over-sensitivity by SPECT-CT. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42015023979.