Throwing darts in ICU: how close are we in estimating energy requirements?. Issue 1 (17th September 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Grguric, Laryssa; Musillo, Lisa; DiGiacomo, Jody C; Munnangi, Swapna
• Is Part Of: Trauma surgery & acute care open. Volume 5:Issue 1(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-09-17
• Subjects: intensive care units -- nutritional sciences; Traumatology -- Periodicals; Critical care medicine -- Periodicals; Wounds and injuries -- Periodicals; 617.1
• DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2020-000493
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2397-5776

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Indirect calorimetry (IC) is the gold standard for determining energy requirement. Due to lack of availability in many institutions, predictive equations are used to estimate energy requirements. The purpose of this study is to determine the accuracy of predictive equations (ie, Harris-Benedict equation (HBE), Mifflin-St Jeor equation (MSJ), and Penn State University equation (PSU)) used to determine energy needs for critically ill, ventilated patients compared with measured resting energy expenditure (mREE). Methods: The researchers examined data routinely collected as part of clinical care for patients within intensive care units (ICUs). The final sample consisted of 68 patients. All studies were recorded during a single inpatient stay within an ICU. Results: Patients, on average, had an mREE of 33.9 kcal/kg using IC. The estimated energy requirement when using predictive equations was 24.8 kcal/kg (HBE×1.25), 24.0 kcal/kg (MSJ×1.25), and 26.8 kcal/kg (PSU). Discussion: This study identified significant differences between mREE and commonly used predictive equations in the ICU. Level of evidence: III.