Automated oxidation‐state assignment for metal sites in coordination complexes in the Cambridge Structural Database. Issue 6 (14th November 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Reeves, Matthew G.; Wood, Peter A.; Parsons, Simon
• Is Part Of: Acta crystallographica. Volume 75:Issue 6(2019:Dec.)
• Page Start: 1096
• Page End: 1105
• Publication Date: 2019-11-14
• Subjects: Cambridge Structural Database -- coordination chemistry -- oxidation states -- transition metals -- bond‐valence sum method
• DOI: 10.1107/S2052520619013040
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2052-5206

Abstract

Abstract : A procedure is described for the automated assignment of oxidation states of transition metals in coordination complexes in the Cambridge Structural Database. Abstract : The Cambridge Structural Database (CSD) currently contains over 400 000 transition‐metal‐containing entries, however many entries still lack curated oxidation‐state assignments. Surveying and editing the remaining entries would be far too resource‐ and time‐intensive to be carried out manually. Here, a highly reliable automated workflow for oxidation‐state assignment in transition‐metal coordination complexes via CSD Python API (application programming interface) scripts is presented. The strengths and limitations of the bond‐valence sum (BVS) method are discussed and the use of complementary methods for improved assignment confidence is explored. In total, four complementary techniques have been implemented in this study. The resulting workflow overcomes the limitations of the BVS approach, widening the applicability of an automated procedure to more CSD entries. Assignments are successful for 99% of the cases where a high consensus between different methodologies is observed. Out of a total number of 54 999 unique metal atoms in a test dataset, the procedure yielded the correct oxidation state in 47 072 (86%) of cases.