Effect of soil water‐repellent layer depth on post‐wildfire hydrological processes. Issue 2 (9th October 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Chen, Jingjing; McGuire, Kevin J.; Stewart, Ryan D.
• Is Part Of: Hydrological processes. Volume 34:Issue 2(2020)
• Page Start: 270
• Page End: 283
• Publication Date: 2019-10-09
• Subjects: humid hardwood forests -- hydrophobicity -- infiltration -- overland flow -- soil water content -- water drop penetration time -- water repellency; Hydrology -- Periodicals; Hydrology -- Research -- Periodicals; Hydrologic models -- Periodicals; Hydrological forecasting -- Periodicals; 631.432
• DOI: 10.1002/hyp.13583
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0885-6087

Abstract

Abstract: Soil water repellency induced by wildfires can alter hydraulic properties and hydrologic processes; however, the persistence and vertical position (i.e., depth) of water‐repellent layers can vary between systems and fires, with limited understanding of how those variations affect infiltration processes. This study occurred in two forested locations in the south‐central Appalachian Mountains that experienced wildfires in late 2016: Mount Pleasant Wildfire Refuge, Virginia, and Chimney Rock State Park, North Carolina. In each location, sites were selected to represent unburned conditions and low to moderate burn intensities. At each site, we measured the soil water repellency at the surface (ash layer or O horizon) and ~2 cm below the surface (A horizon) using the water drop penetration time method ( n = 10–14). Soil water content was also measured over the upper 10 cm of the soil ( n = 10), and infiltration tests were conducted using a tension infiltrometer ( n = 6–8). The results showed that soil repellency was highest in the surface layer at the Mount Pleasant location and was highest in the subsurface layer at the Chimney Rock location. Soil water content was lower in unburned soil than in burned soil, especially for measurements taken immediately postfire, with soil water content negatively correlated with water repellency. Water repellency in the surface layer significantly reduced relative infiltration rates (estimated as differences between initial and steady‐state rates), whereas subsurface water repellency did not affect relative infiltration. As a result, water repellency persisted longer in sites with surface as opposed to subsurface water repellency. Finally, differences between burned and unburned sites showed that although the wildfires increased the occurrence of water repellency, they did not alter the underlying relationship between relative infiltration and water repellency of the surface soil. Abstract : Occurrence of soil water repellency increased after wildfires, with the depth of maximum repellency varying depending on the soil texture and fire severity. Soil water content was lower in unburned soil than in burned soil and was negatively correlated with water repellency. An index based on differences in initial versus steady‐state infiltration rates showed significant correlation with surface water repellency, but not with subsurface water repellency.