A novel method for measuring absolute coronary blood flow and microvascular resistance in patients with ischaemic heart disease. Issue 6 (14th July 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Morris, Paul D; Gosling, Rebecca; Zwierzak, Iwona; Evans, Holli; Aubiniere-Robb, Louise; Czechowicz, Krzysztof; Evans, Paul C; Hose, D Rodney; Lawford, Patricia V; Narracott, Andrew J; Gunn, Julian P
• Is Part Of: Cardiovascular research. Volume 117:Issue 6(2021)
• Page Start: 1567
• Page End: 1577
• Publication Date: 2020-07-14
• Subjects: Coronary blood flow -- Computational fluid dynamics -- Coronary physiology -- Coronary angiography -- Coronary microvascular dysfunction; Cardiovascular system -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Cardiovascular system -- Periodicals; 616.1
• DOI: 10.1093/cvr/cvaa220
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0008-6363

Abstract

Abstract: Aims: Ischaemic heart disease is the reduction of myocardial blood flow, caused by epicardial and/or microvascular disease. Both are common and prognostically important conditions, with distinct guideline-indicated management. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is the current gold-standard assessment of epicardial coronary disease but is only a surrogate of flow and only predicts percentage flow changes. It cannot assess absolute (volumetric) flow or microvascular disease. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a novel method that predicts absolute coronary blood flow and microvascular resistance (MVR) in the catheter laboratory. Methods and results: A computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model was used to predict absolute coronary flow (QCFD ) and coronary MVR using data from routine invasive angiography and pressure-wire assessment. QCFD was validated in an in vitro flow circuit which incorporated patient-specific, three-dimensional printed coronary arteries; and then in vivo, in patients with coronary disease. In vitro, QCFD agreed closely with the experimental flow over all flow rates [bias +2.08 mL/min; 95% confidence interval (error range) −4.7 to +8.8 mL/min; R 2 = 0.999, P < 0.001; variability coefficient <1%]. In vivo, QCFD and MVR were successfully computed in all 40 patients under baseline and hyperaemic conditions, from which coronary flow reserve (CFR) was also calculated. QCFD -derived CFR correlated closely with pressure-derived CFR ( R 2 = 0.92, P < 0.001). This novel method was significantly more accurate than Doppler-wire-derived flow both in vitro (±6.7 vs. ±34 mL/min) and in vivo (±0.9 vs. ±24.4 mmHg). Conclusions: Absolute coronary flow and MVR can be determined alongside FFR, in absolute units, during routine catheter laboratory assessment, without the need for additional catheters, wires or drug infusions. Using this novel method, epicardial and microvascular disease can be discriminated and quantified. This comprehensive coronary physiological assessment may enable a new level of patient stratification and management.