Feasibility of a prehabilitation program before major abdominal surgery. (28th May 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Martin, D; Besson, C; Pache, B; Michel, A; Geinoz, S; Gremeaux-Bader, V; Larcinese, A; Benaim, C; Kayser, B; Demartines, N; Hübner, M
• Is Part Of: British journal of surgery. Volume 108(2021)Supplement 4
• Publication Date: 2021-05-28
• Subjects: Surgery -- Periodicals; 617.005
• DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab202.095
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0007-1323

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: Prehabilitation programs claim to improve exercise capacity and postoperative outcomes. The study aim was to assess the feasibility of a prehabilitation program and its effects on fitness and clinical outcomes after major abdominal surgery. Methods: In this prospective pilot study, patients were assigned to high-intensity physical exercise training with 3 training sessions per week for 3 weeks preoperatively. Feasibility of this intervention was assessed based on recruitment and adherence to the training program. Impact on fitness (VO2 AT) was evaluated and correlated with complications and length of stay (LOS). Results: Of 980 eligible patients, 87 patients (8.9%) were approached for inclusion. Main obstacles to not approach patients were insufficient time (< 3 weeks) prior to scheduled surgery (n = 276, 28.2%) or screening failure (n = 312, 31.8%). Out of these 87 patients, 24 (28%) declined to participate, 43 (49%) met exclusion criteria and 20 (23%) were included. Six patients (30%) could not complete the prehabilitation program due to contra-indication for exercise training evidenced during the test (n = 3), lack of motivation (n = 2) and modification of the planned operating date (n = 1). VO2 AT increased from 9.8 to 11.5 ml/min/kg (p = 0.050). There were no correlations between the change in VO2 AT and postoperative complications (r = -0.133, p = 0.649) and LOS (r = -0.94, p = 0.750). Conclusion: Prehabilitation programs are difficult to implement and many patients are either not eligible or not motivated. Future efforts should concentrate on those patients who are most likely to benefit from these time- and cost-intensive interventions.