Muscle-specific movement-phase-dependent modulation of corticospinal excitability during upper-limb motor execution and motor imagery combined with virtual action observation. (11th June 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Suzuki, Yoshiyuki; Kaneko, Naotsugu; Sasaki, Atsushi; Tanaka, Fumiya; Nakazawa, Kimitaka; Nomura, Taishin; Milosevic, Matija
• Is Part Of: Neuroscience letters. Volume 755(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-06-11
• Subjects: Motor imagery -- Kinesthetic -- Hand -- Corticospinal excitability -- Computer graphics; Neurology -- Periodicals; Neurology -- Periodicals; Research -- Periodicals; Neurologie -- Périodiques; Neuroanatomie -- Périodiques; Neuropharmacologie -- Périodiques; Neurophysiologie -- Périodiques; Neurology; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 617.48
• DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2021.135907
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0304-3940

Abstract

Highlights: Corticospinal excitability during hand motor imagery and execution was compared. Motor imagery was combined with virtual hand action observation. Virtual wrist extension / flexion increased extensor / flexor muscle excitability. Same movement-phase-dependent facilitation was also seen during execution. Kinesthetic motor imagery facilitation was ∼20 % of that during motor execution. Abstract: Corticospinal excitability in humans can be facilitated during imagination and/or observation of upper-limb motor tasks. However, it remains unclear to what extent facilitation levels may differ from those elicited during execution of the same tasks. Twelve able-bodied individuals were recruited in this study. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in extensor carpi radialis (ECR) and flexor carpi radialis (FCR) muscles were elicited through transcranial magnetic stimulation of the primary motor cortex during: (i) rest; (ii) wrist extension; and (iii) wrist flexion. Responses were compared between: (1) motor imagery combined with virtual action observation (MI + AO; first-person virtual wrist movements shown on a computer display, while participants remained at rest and imagined these movements); and (2) motor execution (ME; participants extended or flexed their wrist). During MI + AO, ECR MEPs were facilitated during the extension phase but not the flexion phase, while FCR MEPs were facilitated during the flexion phase but not extension phase, compared to rest. During the ME condition, same, but greater, modulations were shown as those during MI + AO, while background muscle activities were similar in the rest phase as during extension and flexion phase in the MI + AO condition. Our results demonstrated that kinesthetic MI that included imagination and observation of virtual hands can elicit phase-dependent muscles-specific corticospinal facilitation of wrist muscles, consistent to those during actual hand extension and flexion. Moreover, we showed that MI + AO can contribute considerably to the overall corticospinal facilitation (∼20 % of ME) even without muscle contractions. These findings support utility of computer graphics-based motor imagery, which may have implications for rehabilitation and development of brain-computer interfaces.