Real-World Outcomes in Patients with Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion- (BRVO-) Related Macular Edema Treated with Anti-VEGF Injections Alone versus Anti-VEGF Injections Combined with Focal Laser. (20th May 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Real-World Outcomes in Patients with Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion- (BRVO-) Related Macular Edema Treated with Anti-VEGF Injections Alone versus Anti-VEGF Injections Combined with Focal Laser. (20th May 2021)
- Main Title:
- Real-World Outcomes in Patients with Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion- (BRVO-) Related Macular Edema Treated with Anti-VEGF Injections Alone versus Anti-VEGF Injections Combined with Focal Laser
- Authors:
- Thomley, Meredith E.
Gross, Cole N.
Preda-Naumescu, Ana
Chen, Kelly S.
Swain, Thomas
Mason III, John O.
Crosson, Jason N. - Other Names:
- Figus Michele Academic Editor.
- Abstract:
- Abstract : The purpose of this study was to assess outcomes in a real-world nonclinical trial setting of antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections alone vs. focal laser combined with anti-VEGF injections in patients with branch retinal vein occlusion- (BRVO-) related macular edema (ME). This study included 88 BRVO with ME patients who were treated over three years at both a tertiary referral center in the Birmingham metropolitan area and satellites in rural Alabama. One group received only anti-VEGF injections ( n = 56); the other group received both anti-VEGF injections and focal laser ( n = 32). The following outcome measures were evaluated: initial and final visual acuities (VA), initial central subfield thickness (CST) on OCT, number of injections, number of lasers, percentage of patients with a gain of 3 lines of VA, percentage of patients with VA better than or equal to 20/40, and percentage of patients with VA worse than or equal to 20/200. We found that there was no difference in initial VA (p = 0.913 ) or CST (p = 0.961 ) between the two groups. The injection only group required a median of 7 injections, while the combination group required a median of 4 injections, but this was not a statistically significant difference (p = 0.117 ). There was no difference in final VA (p = 0.414 ) or any of the other visual outcomes between the two groups. In conclusion, focal laser did not decrease the number of injections required or improve the VA inAbstract : The purpose of this study was to assess outcomes in a real-world nonclinical trial setting of antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections alone vs. focal laser combined with anti-VEGF injections in patients with branch retinal vein occlusion- (BRVO-) related macular edema (ME). This study included 88 BRVO with ME patients who were treated over three years at both a tertiary referral center in the Birmingham metropolitan area and satellites in rural Alabama. One group received only anti-VEGF injections ( n = 56); the other group received both anti-VEGF injections and focal laser ( n = 32). The following outcome measures were evaluated: initial and final visual acuities (VA), initial central subfield thickness (CST) on OCT, number of injections, number of lasers, percentage of patients with a gain of 3 lines of VA, percentage of patients with VA better than or equal to 20/40, and percentage of patients with VA worse than or equal to 20/200. We found that there was no difference in initial VA (p = 0.913 ) or CST (p = 0.961 ) between the two groups. The injection only group required a median of 7 injections, while the combination group required a median of 4 injections, but this was not a statistically significant difference (p = 0.117 ). There was no difference in final VA (p = 0.414 ) or any of the other visual outcomes between the two groups. In conclusion, focal laser did not decrease the number of injections required or improve the VA in BRVO-related ME. Although visual outcomes were similar in both groups, focal laser does not appear to be of additional benefit in BRVO-related ME in the anti-VEGF era. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of ophthalmology. Volume 2021(2021)
- Journal:
- Journal of ophthalmology
- Issue:
- Volume 2021(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 2021, Issue 2021 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 2021
- Issue:
- 2021
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-2021-2021-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2021-05-20
- Subjects:
- Ophthalmology -- Periodicals
Eye Diseases
Ophthalmology
Ophthalmology
Electronic journals
Periodicals
Periodicals
Fulltext
Internet Resources
Periodicals
617.7 - Journal URLs:
- https://www.hindawi.com/journals/joph/ ↗
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/journals/1195/ ↗
http://bibpurl.oclc.org/web/46495 ↗
http://search.ebscohost.com/direct.asp?db=a9h&jid=%229038%22&scope=site ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1155/2021/6641008 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2090-004X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store
- Ingest File:
- 17164.xml