Intraocular pressure fluctuation during resistance exercise. Issue 1 (13th May 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Vaghefi, Ehsan; Shon, Catherine; Reading, Stacey; Sutherland, Taylor; Borges, Victor; Phillips, Geraint; Niederer, Rachael L; Danesh-Meyer, Helen
• Is Part Of: BMJ open ophthalmology. Volume 6:Issue 1(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-05-13
• Subjects: intraocular pressure -- glaucoma; Ophthalmology -- Periodicals; 617.7005
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjophth-2021-000723
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2397-3269

Abstract

Abstract : Objective: To evaluate the effect of weightlifting (leg press) on intraocular pressure (IOP). Design: Prospective cohort study. Subjects: A total of 24 participants met the inclusion criteria and completed the study procedures. Participants had an average age of 22.7±2.7 years and included nine women. The mean baseline IOP was 13.9 mm Hg (SD=2.4) with an average body mass index of 24.5 (SD= 3.1). Methods: The maximum load for a single lift was found for each participant. Participants then performed three leg press regimens: one repetition using 95% of maximal load (1RM), six repetitions using 75% of maximal load (6RM) and isometric push against a weight much heavier than maximal load (ISO). Main outcome measure: IOP was measured pre-exercise, during and immediately following the exercise using an iCare TA01i rebound tonometer. Blood pressure and HR were being monitored continuously during the lift. Optical coherence tomography images were obtained pre and postexercise session. Results: The average maximum weight lifted by our participants was 331.9 Kg (SD=97.3). Transient increased IOP was observed across the 1RM, 6RM and ISO exercises with an average increase in 26.4 mm Hg (23.7 mm Hg to 28.7 mm Hg) to reach an average max IOP of 40.7 mm Hg (27.8 mm Hg to 54.2 mm Hg), with an absolute maximum of 70 mm Hg in one participant. Conclusions: There is a transient and dramatic fluctuation in IOP with resistance training. This coupled with regular exposure to resistance training is potentially a significant risk factor for glaucoma. It should be noted that this study has been carried out in a healthy young population, and, thus, the external validity of these results in glaucoma participants requires further investigation.