Delivering screening programmes in primary care: protocol for a scoping and systematic mixed studies review. Issue 4 (15th April 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Modi, Rakesh Narendra; Kelly, Sarah; Hoare, Sarah; Powell, Alison; Kuhn, Isla; Usher-Smith, Juliet; Mant, Jonathan; Burt, Jenni
• Is Part Of: BMJ open. Volume 11:Issue 4(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-04-15
• Subjects: primary care -- public health -- preventive medicine -- statistics & research methods -- health policy; Medicine -- Research -- Periodicals; 610.72
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046331
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2044-6055

Abstract

Abstract : Introduction: Screening programmes represent a considerable amount of healthcare activity. As complex interventions, they require careful delivery to generate net benefit. Much screening work occurs in primary care. Despite intensive study of intervention delivery in primary care, there is currently no synthesis of the delivery of screening programmes in this setting. The purpose of this review is to describe and critically evaluate the delivery of screening programmes in general practice and community services. Methods and analysis: We will use scoping review methods to explore which components of screening programmes are delivered in primary care and systematic review methods to locate and synthesise evidence on how screening programmes can be delivered in primary care, including barriers, facilitators and strategies. We will include empirical studies of any design which consider screening programmes in high-income countries, based in part or whole in primary care. We will search 20 information sources from 1 January 2000, including those relating to health (eg, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL), management (eg, Rx for change database) and grey literature (eg, OpenGrey, screening committee websites). Two reviewers will screen citations and full texts of potentially eligible studies and assess these against inclusion criteria. Qualitative and quantitative data will be extracted in duplicate and synthesised using a best fit framework approach. Within the systematic review, the mixed methods appraisal tool will be used to assess risk of bias. Ethics and dissemination: No ethics approval is required. We will disseminate findings to academics through publication and presentation, to decision-makers through national screening bodies, to practitioners through professional bodies, and to the public through social media. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020215420.