Comparison of pulse oximetry and earlobe blood gas with CO-oximetry in children with sickle cell disease: a retrospective review. Issue 1 (15th June 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comparison of pulse oximetry and earlobe blood gas with CO-oximetry in children with sickle cell disease: a retrospective review. Issue 1 (15th June 2020)
- Main Title:
- Comparison of pulse oximetry and earlobe blood gas with CO-oximetry in children with sickle cell disease: a retrospective review
- Authors:
- Arigliani, Michele
Zheng, Sean
Ruiz, Gary
Chakravorty, Subarna
Bossley, Cara J
Rees, David
Gupta, Atul - Abstract:
- Abstract : Objectives: To investigate the agreement between pulse oximetry (SpO2 ) and oxygen saturation (SaO2 ) measured by CO-oximetry on arterialised earlobe blood gas (EBG) in children and adolescents with sickle cell disease (SCD). Design and setting: We retrospectively reviewed 39 simultaneous and paired SaO2 EBG and SpO2 measurements from 33 ambulatory patients with SCD (32 subjects with Haemoglobin SS and one with Haemoglobin Sß +, 52% male, mean±SD age 11.0±3.6, age range 5–18). Measurements were performed between 2012 and 2015 when participants were asymptomatic. Hypoxaemia was defined as SaO2 ≤93%. A Bland-Altman analysis was performed to assess the accuracy of SpO2 as compared with EBG SaO2 . Results: The mean±SD SpO2 and SaO2 values in the same patients were, respectively, 93.6%±3.7% and 94.3%±2.9%. The bias SpO2 –SaO2 was −0.7% (95% limits of agreement from −5.4% to 4.1%) and precision was 2.5%. In 9/39 (23%) cases, the difference in SpO2 –SaO2 was greater than the expected error range ±2%, with SaO2 more often underestimated by SpO2 (6/9), especially at SpO2 values ≤93%. Thirteen participants (33%) were hypoxaemic. The sensitivity of SpO2 for hypoxaemia was 100%, specificity 85% and positive predictive value 76%. Conclusions: Pulse oximetry was inaccurate in almost a quarter of measurements in ambulatory paediatric patients with SCD, especially at SpO2 values ≤93%. In these cases, oxygen saturation can be confirmed through EBG CO-oximetry, which is easier toAbstract : Objectives: To investigate the agreement between pulse oximetry (SpO2 ) and oxygen saturation (SaO2 ) measured by CO-oximetry on arterialised earlobe blood gas (EBG) in children and adolescents with sickle cell disease (SCD). Design and setting: We retrospectively reviewed 39 simultaneous and paired SaO2 EBG and SpO2 measurements from 33 ambulatory patients with SCD (32 subjects with Haemoglobin SS and one with Haemoglobin Sß +, 52% male, mean±SD age 11.0±3.6, age range 5–18). Measurements were performed between 2012 and 2015 when participants were asymptomatic. Hypoxaemia was defined as SaO2 ≤93%. A Bland-Altman analysis was performed to assess the accuracy of SpO2 as compared with EBG SaO2 . Results: The mean±SD SpO2 and SaO2 values in the same patients were, respectively, 93.6%±3.7% and 94.3%±2.9%. The bias SpO2 –SaO2 was −0.7% (95% limits of agreement from −5.4% to 4.1%) and precision was 2.5%. In 9/39 (23%) cases, the difference in SpO2 –SaO2 was greater than the expected error range ±2%, with SaO2 more often underestimated by SpO2 (6/9), especially at SpO2 values ≤93%. Thirteen participants (33%) were hypoxaemic. The sensitivity of SpO2 for hypoxaemia was 100%, specificity 85% and positive predictive value 76%. Conclusions: Pulse oximetry was inaccurate in almost a quarter of measurements in ambulatory paediatric patients with SCD, especially at SpO2 values ≤93%. In these cases, oxygen saturation can be confirmed through EBG CO-oximetry, which is easier to perform and less painful than traditional arterial blood sampling. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- BMJ paediatrics open. Volume 4:Issue 1(2020)
- Journal:
- BMJ paediatrics open
- Issue:
- Volume 4:Issue 1(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 4, Issue 1 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 4
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0004-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2020-06-15
- Subjects:
- haematology -- respiratory
Pediatrics -- Periodicals
Children -- Health and hygiene -- Periodicals
618.920005 - Journal URLs:
- http://bmjpaedsopen.bmj.com/ ↗
http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/bmjpo-2020-000690 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2399-9772
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 17114.xml