056 Effects of Simulated Shift Schedules on Visual Search. (3rd May 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hudson, Amanda; Hinson, John; Whitney, Paul; Crooks, Elena; Shattuck, Nita; Matsangas, Panagiotis; Van Dongen, Hans; Honn, Kimberly
• Is Part Of: Sleep. Volume 44(2021)Supplement 2
• Page Start: A23
• Page End: A24
• Publication Date: 2021-05-03
• Subjects: Sleep -- Physiological aspects -- Periodicals; Sleep disorders -- Periodicals; Sommeil -- Aspect physiologique -- Périodiques; Sommeil, Troubles du -- Périodiques; Sleep disorders; Sleep -- Physiological aspects; Sleep -- physiological aspects; Sleep Wake Disorders; Psychophysiology; Electronic journals; Periodicals; 616.8498
• DOI: 10.1093/sleep/zsab072.055
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0161-8105

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: Visual search is important in many operational tasks, such as passive sonar monitoring in naval operations. Shift work can contribute to fatigue and task performance impairment; in particular, backward rotating shift schedules have been shown to impair vigilant attention performance. However, the impact on visual search performance, above and beyond impaired vigilant attention, is unknown. We investigated the effects of two distinct shift work schedules using a visual search task with properties of real-life visual search performance. Methods: N=13 adult males (ages 18–39) completed a 6-day/5-night laboratory study with an acclimation day, four simulated shift days, and a recovery day. Shift days involved either a 5h-on/15h-off backward rotating schedule (n=8) or a 3h-on/9h-off fixed schedule (n=5). The visual search task was performed once per shift at varying time of day depending on shift. Participants viewed search arrays where stimuli consisted of colored letters of different shapes. Over three trial blocks of 24 trials each, participants determined if a target was present or absent among 1, 5, 15, or 30 distractors. Similarity between targets and distractors was manipulated between blocks, such that targets differed from distractors by color only, shape only, or either color or shape but not both. For each distinct target feature block, and separately for presence or absence of a target, slopes of response times regressed against number of stimuli were calculated to quantify visual search rates. Mixed-effects ANOVA was used to analyze visual search rates by shift schedule and shift day. Results: There were no significant effects of shift schedule (all p>0.30), shift day (all p>0.13), or their interaction (all p>0.22) on visual search rates. Conclusion: Previous work showed degraded vigilant attention in the shift schedules considered here, especially in the backward rotating schedule, which may compromise operational performance. However, while our sample may have been too small to have adequate statistical power, we failed to identify specific impairments in visual search with statistical significance. It remains to be determined whether greater levels of fatigue, such as could be induced by total sleep deprivation, would reveal significant visual search deficits. Support (if any): Naval Postgraduate School award N62271-13-M-1228