156 Evening Light-Induced Circadian Phase Shift in Preschool-Aged Children. (3rd May 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hartstein, Lauren; Akacem, Lameese; Behn, Cecilia Diniz; Stowe, Shelby; Wright, Kenneth; LeBourgeois, Monique
• Is Part Of: Sleep. Volume 44(2021)Supplement 2
• Page Start: A63
• Page End: A64
• Publication Date: 2021-05-03
• Subjects: Sleep -- Physiological aspects -- Periodicals; Sleep disorders -- Periodicals; Sommeil -- Aspect physiologique -- Périodiques; Sommeil, Troubles du -- Périodiques; Sleep disorders; Sleep -- Physiological aspects; Sleep -- physiological aspects; Sleep Wake Disorders; Psychophysiology; Electronic journals; Periodicals; 616.8498
• DOI: 10.1093/sleep/zsab072.155
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0161-8105

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: In adults, exposure to light at night delays the timing of the circadian clock in a dose-dependent manner with intensity. Although children's melatonin levels are highly suppressed by evening bright light, the sensitivity of young children's circadian timing to evening light is unknown. This research aimed to establish an illuminance response curve for phase delay in preschool children as a result of exposure to varying light intensities in the hour before bedtime. Methods: Healthy children (n=36, 3.0 – 4.9 years, 39% males), participated in a 10-day protocol. For 7 days, children followed a strict parent-selected sleep schedule. On Days 8-10, an in-home dim-light assessment was performed. On Day 8, dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) was measured through saliva samples collected in 20-30-min intervals throughout the evening until 1-h past habitual bedtime. On Day 9, children were exposed to a white light stimulus (semi-randomly assigned from 5lx to 5000lx) for 1-h before their habitual bedtime, and saliva was collected before, during, and after the exposure. On Day 10, children provided saliva samples in the evening for 2.5-h past bedtime for a final DLMO assessment. Phase angle of entrainment (habitual bedtime – DLMObaseline) and circadian phase delay (DLMOfinal – DLMObaseline) were computed. Results: Final DLMO (Day 10) shifted between -8 and 123 minutes (M = 56.1 +/- 33.6 min; negative value = phase advance, positive value = phase delay) compared with DLMO at baseline (Day 8). Raw phase shift did not demonstrate a dose-dependent relationship with light intensity. Rather, we observed a robust phase delay across all intensities. Conclusion: These data suggest preschoolers' circadian clocks are immensely sensitive to a large range of light intensities, which may be mechanistically influenced by less mature ophthalmologic features (e.g. clearer lenses, larger pupils). With young children's ever-growing use of light-emitting devices and evening exposure to artificial lighting, as well as the prevalence of behavioral sleep problems, these findings may inform recommendations for parents on the effects of evening light exposure on sleep timing in early childhood. Support (if any): This research was supported with funds from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development (R01-HD087707).