Improving the quality and quantity of clinical and translational research statewide: An application of group concept mapping. Issue 1 (5th January 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Fede, Jacquelyn; Kogut, Stephen J.; Hayward, Anthony; Stevenson, John F.; Willey-Temkin, Cynthia; Fournier, Heather; Stranieri, Gabrielle; Kimberly, Judy A.; Padbury, James
• Is Part Of: Journal of clinical and translational science. Volume 5:Issue 1(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-01-05
• Subjects: Clinical translational research, -- evaluation, -- mixed methods, -- stakeholder engagement, -- qualitative methods; Clinical medicine -- Research -- Periodicals; Medicine, Experimental -- Periodicals; Human experimentation in medicine -- Periodicals; 616.027
• DOI: 10.1017/cts.2020.572
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2059-8661

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: Advance Clinical and Translational Research (Advance-CTR) serves as a central hub to support and educate clinical and translational researchers in Rhode Island. Understanding barriers to clinical research in the state is the key to setting project aims and priorities. Methods: We implemented a Group Concept Mapping exercise to characterize the views of researchers and administrators regarding how to increase the quality and quantity of clinical and translational research in their settings. Participants generated ideas in response to this prompt and rated each unique idea in terms of how important it was and feasible it seemed to them. Results: Participants generated 78 unique ideas, from which 9 key themes emerged (e.g., Building connections between researchers ). Items rated highest in perceived importance and feasibility included providing seed grants for pilot projects, connecting researchers with common interests and networking opportunities. Implications of results are discussed. Conclusions: The Group Concept Mapping exercise enabled our project leadership to better understand stakeholder-perceived priorities and to act on ideas and aims most relevant to researchers in the state. This method is well suited to translational research enterprises beyond Rhode Island when a participatory evaluation stance is desired.