The use of strategies from the social sciences to inform pipeline development programs for under-represented minority faculty and students in the health sciences. Issue 1 (14th December 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Matthews, Alicia K.; Allen-Meares, Paula; Watson, Karriem; Crooks, Natasha; Smith, Ariel; Hart, Alysha; Estrella, Mayra L.; Kim, Sage
• Is Part Of: Journal of clinical and translational science. Volume 5:Issue 1(2021)
• Publication Date: 2020-12-14
• Subjects: Pipeline development programs, -- under-represented minorities, -- social sciences research, -- health sciences, -- recruitment and retention; Clinical medicine -- Research -- Periodicals; Medicine, Experimental -- Periodicals; Human experimentation in medicine -- Periodicals; 616.027
• DOI: 10.1017/cts.2020.566
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2059-8661

Abstract

Abstract: Representation of under-represented minority (URM) faculty in the health sciences disciplines is persistently low relative to both national and student population demographics. Although some progress has been made through nationally funded pipeline development programs, demographic disparities in the various health sciences disciplines remain. As such the development of innovative interventions to help URM faculty and students overcome barriers to advancement remains a national priority. To date, the majority of pipeline development programs have focused on academic readiness, mentorship, and professional development. However, insights from the social sciences literature related to "extra-academic" (e.g., racism) barriers to URM persistence in higher education suggest the limitations of efforts exclusively focused on cognitively mediated endpoints. The purpose of this article is to synthesize findings from the social sciences literature that can inform the enhancement of URM pipeline development programs. Specifically, we highlight research related to the social, emotional, and contextual correlates of URM success in higher education including reducing social isolation, increasing engagement with research, bolstering persistence, enhancing mentoring models, and creating institutional change. Supporting URM's success in the health sciences has implications for the development of a workforce with the capacity to understand and intervene on the drivers of health inequalities.