Health worker migration and migrant healthcare: Seeking cosmopolitanism in the NHS. (30th April 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Shahvisi, Arianne
• Other Names: Klingler Corinna guestEditor.; Odukoya Dennis guestEditor.; Kuehlmeyer Katja guestEditor.
• Is Part Of: Bioethics. Volume 32:Number 6(2018)
• Page Start: 334
• Page End: 342
• Publication Date: 2018-04-30
• Subjects: cosmopolitanism -- global health -- migration -- NHS; Bioethics -- Periodicals; 174.957
• DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12432
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0269-9702

Abstract

Abstract: The U.K.'s National Health Service (NHS) is critically reliant on staff from overseas, which means that a sizeable number of U.K. healthcare professionals have received their training at the cost of other states, whose populations are urgently in need of healthcare professionals. At the same time, while healthcare is widely seen as a primary good, many migrants are unable to access the NHS without charge, and anti‐immigration political trends are likely to further reduce that access. Both of these topics have received close attention in the global health ethics literature. In this article, I make the novel move of suggesting that these two seemingly disparate issues should be folded into the same moral narrative. The 'brain drain' upon which the NHS and its users depend derives from the same gradient of wealth, security, and opportunity that produces migrants who require the NHS. I endorse moral cosmopolitanism as a lens for understanding patients' right to healthcare regardless of nationality or immigration status. I argue that the NHS in its current formulation effectively enacts a partial cosmopolitanism in its reliance on medical workers from abroad, but could more meaningfully instantiate that cosmopolitanism were it to offer the same healthcare to migrants as it does to citizens.