The relevance of a digestibility evaluation in the allergenicity risk assessment of novel proteins. Opinion of a joint initiative of COST action ImpARAS and COST action INFOGEST. (July 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Verhoeckx, Kitty; Bøgh, Katrine Lindholm; Dupont, Didier; Egger, Lotti; Gadermaier, Gabriele; Larré, Colette; Mackie, Alan; Menard, Olivia; Adel-Patient, Karine; Picariello, Gianluca; Portmann, Reto; Smit, Joost; Turner, Paul; Untersmayr, Eva; Epstein, Michelle M.
• Is Part Of: Food and chemical toxicology. Volume 129(2019)
• Page Start: 405
• Page End: 423
• Publication Date: 2019-07
• Subjects: Food allergy -- Food digestion -- Allergenicity risk assessment -- Novel proteins -- In vitro protein digestibility tests; AD Atopic dermatitis -- APC Antigen presenting cells -- BBM Brush border membrane -- DCs Dendritic cells -- GMO Genetically modified organism -- GI Gastrointestinal -- HPLC High-pressure liquid chromatography -- MS Mass spectrometry -- OVA Ovalbumin -- SPT Skin prick test; Toxicology -- Periodicals; Food poisoning -- Periodicals; Food Poisoning -- Periodicals; Toxicology -- Periodicals; Toxicologie -- Périodiques; Intoxications alimentaires -- Périodiques; Food poisoning; Toxicology; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 615.9
• DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2019.04.052
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0278-6915

Abstract

Abstract: The current allergenicity assessment of novel proteins is based on the EFSA GMO guidance. Recently, EFSA launched a new guidance document on allergenicity assessment of GM plants (2017). This document describes, amongst other topics, the new scientific and regulatory developments on in vitro protein digestibility tests. The EFSA GMO Panel stated that for in vitro protein digestibility tests, additional investigations are needed before any additional recommendation in the form of guidance can be provided. To this end, an interim phase is considered necessary to evaluate the revisions to the in vitro gastrointestinal digestion test, proposed by EFSA. This prompted the establishment of a joint workshop through two COST Action networks: COST Action ImpARAS and COST Acton INFOGEST. In 2017, a workshop was organised to discuss the relevance of digestion in allergenicity risk assessment and how to potentially improve the current methods and readouts. The outcome of the workshop is that there is no rationale for a clear readout that is predictive for allergenicity and we suggest to omit the digestion test from the allergenicity assessment strategy for now, and put an effort into filling the knowledge gaps as summarized in this paper first. Highlights: Protein digestion is relevant for allergenicity of some proteins, but not for all. It is not clear yet how different factors exactly influence digestion and how these factors can be included. Including all factors will complicate the elaboration of a simple and predictive digestion assay. There is no rationale for a clear readout that is predictive for allergenicity. We suggest to omit the digestion test from the allergenicity assessment for now and put effort into filling the knowledge gaps.