Unanticipated jump-landing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Does unanticipated jump-landing testing deliver additional return to sport information to traditional jump performance tests?. (December 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Niemeyer, Philipp; Niederer, Daniel; Giesche, Florian; Janko, Maren; Frank, Johannes; Vogt, Lutz; Banzer, Winfried
• Is Part Of: Clinical biomechanics. Volume 70(2019)
• Page Start: 72
• Page End: 79
• Publication Date: 2019-12
• Subjects: Return to sports -- Return to play -- RTP -- Non-anticipated -- Re-injury risk -- Functional diagnosis; Biomechanics -- Periodicals; Osteopathic medicine -- Periodicals; Biomechanics -- Periodicals; Osteopathic Medicine -- Periodicals; 612.76
• DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.08.003
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0268-0033

Abstract

Abstract: Background: We aimed to delineate if unanticipated jump-landing assessments delivers complementary information to those of commonly used hop and jump tests after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Methods: Eleven participants (5 males) performed a series of unanticipated jump-landings and traditional hop and jump performance tests (single leg hops for distance, triple crossover hops for distance and drop jumps). The number of mistrials, time to stabilization and peak ground reaction force (pGRF) at landing and jump/hop distance were measured. Pearson correlations to find potential associations between the unanticipated jump-landing-values and the traditional jump/hop performance tests were calculated twice: once for the affected and once for the unaffected legs. t -Tests for dependent samples were used to detect differences between affected and unaffected leg within each test condition. Findings: The pGRF at unanticipated landing significantly correlated to the pGRF at drop jump landing (r = 0.68) and the hopping distance after the triple crossover hops (r = 0.71, each p < .05). No other significant correlation occurred (p > .05). Hopping distance after single leg hops (mean: 110.2 cm vs. 95.5 cm) and triple crossover hops for distance (mean: 315.3 cm vs. 294.2 cm) showed significant differences between the unaffected and the reconstructed leg (p < .05). Other parameters showed no significant between-legs differences (p > .05). Interpretation: Both, the reconstructed and the contralateral leg seems to be affected. Unanticipated jump landing tasks deliver information beyond those of commonly used jump and hop tests, the thereby assessed abilities may thus be a complementary aspect of dynamic knee function than those assessed with classic tests. Highlights: Unanticipated jump landing tasks deliver additional information to common used jump performance tests. The thereby assessed ability may be a complementary aspect of dynamic knee function. An anterior cruciate ligament injury seems to affect both, the reconstructed and the contralateral leg.