Barrier damaging effects of n‐propanol in occlusion‐modified tandem repeated irritation test: Modulation by exposure factors and atopic skin disease. (7th November 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Angelova‐Fischer, Irena; Soltanipoor, Maryam; Stilla, Tasja; Fischer, Tobias W.; Kezic, Sanja; Jakasa, Ivone
• Is Part Of: Contact dermatitis. Volume 82:Number 1(2020)
• Page Start: 1
• Page End: 9
• Publication Date: 2019-11-07
• Subjects: alcohol‐based hand disinfectants -- atopic dermatitis -- irritant contact dermatitis -- natural moisturizing factors -- skin barrier; Contact dermatitis -- Periodicals; 616.51
• DOI: 10.1111/cod.13368
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0105-1873

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Recent studies provide evidence for significant and previously underestimated barrier damaging effects of repeated exposure to 60% n ‐propanol in healthy skin in vivo . Objectives: To investigate further the cumulative effects of a range of n ‐propanol concentrations relevant at the workplace in healthy and atopic dermatitis (AD) individuals, and study the modulation of the outcomes by co‐exposure and host‐related factors. Methods: Healthy adult and AD volunteers were exposed to n ‐propanol concentrations from 30% to 75% in occlusion‐modified tandem repeated irritation test with measurements of erythema, transepidermal water loss, capacitance, and the natural moisturizing factor (NMF) levels at baseline and after 96 hours. Results: n ‐Propanol exerted significant barrier damaging effects even at the lowest concentration in both groups. Exposure to all n ‐propanol concentrations significantly reduced the NMF levels. Preceding low‐grade trauma by occlusion/water exposure reduced the skin irritation threshold in both groups. The differences in the severity of the barrier function impairment after exposure to the same concentrations under the same conditions between the AD and control groups were significant. Conclusions: The negative effects of cumulative exposure to n ‐propanol in healthy and atopic skin shown in the study suggest the need for critical re‐evaluation of its irritant properties in vivo .