The Miami International Evidence-based Guidelines on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Resection. Issue 1 (January 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- The Miami International Evidence-based Guidelines on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Resection. Issue 1 (January 2020)
- Main Title:
- The Miami International Evidence-based Guidelines on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Resection
- Authors:
- Asbun, Horacio J.
Moekotte, Alma L.
Vissers, Frederique L.
Kunzler, Filipe
Cipriani, Federica
Alseidi, Adnan
D'Angelica, Michael I.
Balduzzi, Alberto
Bassi, Claudio
Björnsson, Bergthor
Boggi, Ugo
Callery, Mark P.
Del Chiaro, Marco
Coimbra, Felipe J.
Conrad, Claudius
Cook, Andrew
Coppola, Alessandro
Dervenis, Christos
Dokmak, Safi
Edil, Barish H.
Edwin, Bjørn
Giulianotti, Pier C.
Han, Ho-Seong
Hansen, Paul D.
van der Heijde, Nicky
van Hilst, Jony
Hester, Caitlin A.
Hogg, Melissa E.
Jarufe, Nicolas
Jeyarajah, D. Rohan
Keck, Tobias
Kim, Song Cheol
Khatkov, Igor E.
Kokudo, Norihiro
Kooby, David A.
Korrel, Maarten
de Leon, Francisco J.
Lluis, Nuria
Lof, Sanne
Machado, Marcel A.
Demartines, Nicolas
Martinie, John B.
Merchant, Nipun B.
Molenaar, I. Quintus
Moravek, Cassadie
Mou, Yi-Ping
Nakamura, Masafumi
Nealon, William H.
Palanivelu, Chinnusamy
Pessaux, Patrick
Pitt, Henry A.
Polanco, Patricio M.
Primrose, John N.
Rawashdeh, Arab
Sanford, Dominic E.
Senthilnathan, Palanisamy
Shrikhande, Shailesh V.
Stauffer, John A.
Takaori, Kyoichi
Talamonti, Mark S.
Tang, Chung N.
Vollmer, Charles M.
Wakabayashi, Go
Walsh, R. Matthew
Wang, Shin-E
Zinner, Michael J.
Wolfgang, Christopher L.
Zureikat, Amer H.
Zwart, Maurice J.
Conlon, Kevin C.
Kendrick, Michael L.
Zeh, Herbert J.
Hilal, Mohammad Abu
Besselink, Marc G.
… (more) - Abstract:
- Abstract : Objective: The aim of this study was to develop and externally validate the first evidence-based guidelines on minimally invasive pancreas resection (MIPR) before and during the International Evidence-based Guidelines on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Resection (IG-MIPR) meeting in Miami (March 2019). Summary Background Data: MIPR has seen rapid development in the past decade. Promising outcomes have been reported by early adopters from high-volume centers. Subsequently, multicenter series as well as randomized controlled trials were reported; however, guidelines for clinical practice were lacking. Methods: The Scottisch Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) methodology was used, incorporating these 4 items: systematic reviews using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases to answer clinical questions, whenever possible in PICO style, the GRADE approach for assessment of the quality of evidence, the Delphi method for establishing consensus on the developed recommendations, and the AGREE-II instrument for the assessment of guideline quality and external validation. The current guidelines are cosponsored by the International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association, the Americas Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association, the Asian-Pacific Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association, the European-African Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association, the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery, Pancreas Club, the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgery, the Society forAbstract : Objective: The aim of this study was to develop and externally validate the first evidence-based guidelines on minimally invasive pancreas resection (MIPR) before and during the International Evidence-based Guidelines on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Resection (IG-MIPR) meeting in Miami (March 2019). Summary Background Data: MIPR has seen rapid development in the past decade. Promising outcomes have been reported by early adopters from high-volume centers. Subsequently, multicenter series as well as randomized controlled trials were reported; however, guidelines for clinical practice were lacking. Methods: The Scottisch Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) methodology was used, incorporating these 4 items: systematic reviews using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases to answer clinical questions, whenever possible in PICO style, the GRADE approach for assessment of the quality of evidence, the Delphi method for establishing consensus on the developed recommendations, and the AGREE-II instrument for the assessment of guideline quality and external validation. The current guidelines are cosponsored by the International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association, the Americas Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association, the Asian-Pacific Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association, the European-African Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association, the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery, Pancreas Club, the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgery, the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, and the Society of Surgical Oncology. Results: After screening 16, 069 titles, 694 studies were reviewed, and 291 were included. The final 28 recommendations covered 6 topics; laparoscopic and robotic distal pancreatectomy, central pancreatectomy, pancreatoduodenectomy, as well as patient selection, training, learning curve, and minimal annual center volume required to obtain optimal outcomes and patient safety. Conclusion: The IG-MIPR using SIGN methodology give guidance to surgeons, hospital administrators, patients, and medical societies on the use and outcome of MIPR as well as the approach to be taken regarding this challenging type of surgery. Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Annals of surgery. Volume 271:Issue 1(2020)
- Journal:
- Annals of surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 271:Issue 1(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 271, Issue 1 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 271
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0271-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2020-01
- Subjects:
- central pancreatectomy -- distal pancreatectomy -- guidelines -- implementation -- laparoscopic -- left pancreatectomy -- minimally invasive -- pancreatoduodenectomy -- robot -- robot assisted -- robotic -- techniques -- training -- Whipple
Surgery -- Periodicals
617.005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.annalsofsurgery.com ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003590 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0003-4932
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 1044.500000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 17104.xml