Electrocatheter-mediated High-voltage Pulsed Radiofrequency of the Dorsal Root Ganglion in the Treatment of Chronic Lumbosacral Neuropathic Pain: A Randomized Controlled Study. Issue 1 (January 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Electrocatheter-mediated High-voltage Pulsed Radiofrequency of the Dorsal Root Ganglion in the Treatment of Chronic Lumbosacral Neuropathic Pain: A Randomized Controlled Study. Issue 1 (January 2020)
- Main Title:
- Electrocatheter-mediated High-voltage Pulsed Radiofrequency of the Dorsal Root Ganglion in the Treatment of Chronic Lumbosacral Neuropathic Pain
- Authors:
- Vigneri, Simone
Sindaco, Gianfranco
La Grua, Marco
Zanella, Matteo
Lo Bianco, Giuliano
Paci, Valentina
Vinci, Francesca M.
Sciacca, Chiara
Ravaioli, Laura
Pari, Gilberto - Abstract:
- Abstract : Objectives: Despite the interest in scientific community, there is still poor evidence about pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) efficacy in the treatment of neuropathic pain. In order to determine whether high-voltage PRF and epidural adhesiolysis (PRF-EA) showed better results than epidural adhesiolysis alone (EA), a randomized, double-blind, comparative-effectiveness study was conducted in patients with chronic lumbosacral radiating pain and neuropathic features. Materials and Methods: A total of 41 patients were randomly allocated to 2 groups. Twenty-one patients were randomized to receive 2 cycles of 240 seconds high-voltage PRF followed by the injection of local anesthetics, hyaluronidase, and betamethasone, whereas 20 patients underwent sham stimulation followed by adhesiolysis. The treatment was delivered at the affected lumbosacral roots and patients, treating physicians and assessors were blinded to intervention. Results: A significant reduction of radiating pain was observed in mean Numeric Rating Scale score at follow-up. A change of −3.43 versus −1.75 ( P =0.031) after 1 month and −3.34 versus −0.80 ( P =0.005) after 6 months was reported in patients undergoing PRF-EA in comparison with EA, respectively. After 1 month, 57% of patients in the PRF-EA group experienced a pain reduction of ≥50% versus only 25% of patients allocated to EA ( P =0.037). Improvement decreased to 48% in the PRF-EA group whereas only 10% of EA reported significant pain relief after 6Abstract : Objectives: Despite the interest in scientific community, there is still poor evidence about pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) efficacy in the treatment of neuropathic pain. In order to determine whether high-voltage PRF and epidural adhesiolysis (PRF-EA) showed better results than epidural adhesiolysis alone (EA), a randomized, double-blind, comparative-effectiveness study was conducted in patients with chronic lumbosacral radiating pain and neuropathic features. Materials and Methods: A total of 41 patients were randomly allocated to 2 groups. Twenty-one patients were randomized to receive 2 cycles of 240 seconds high-voltage PRF followed by the injection of local anesthetics, hyaluronidase, and betamethasone, whereas 20 patients underwent sham stimulation followed by adhesiolysis. The treatment was delivered at the affected lumbosacral roots and patients, treating physicians and assessors were blinded to intervention. Results: A significant reduction of radiating pain was observed in mean Numeric Rating Scale score at follow-up. A change of −3.43 versus −1.75 ( P =0.031) after 1 month and −3.34 versus −0.80 ( P =0.005) after 6 months was reported in patients undergoing PRF-EA in comparison with EA, respectively. After 1 month, 57% of patients in the PRF-EA group experienced a pain reduction of ≥50% versus only 25% of patients allocated to EA ( P =0.037). Improvement decreased to 48% in the PRF-EA group whereas only 10% of EA reported significant pain relief after 6 months ( P =0.008). Discussion: High-voltage PRF of dorsal root ganglion delivered through multifunctional electrode provided significant pain relief and may be considered a valuable treatment in chronic lumbosacral radicular pain with neuropathic features. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Clinical journal of pain. Volume 36:Issue 1(2020)
- Journal:
- Clinical journal of pain
- Issue:
- Volume 36:Issue 1(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 36, Issue 1 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 36
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0036-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2020-01
- Subjects:
- PRF -- adhesiolysis -- radiculopathy -- neuropathic pain -- NRS
Pain -- Periodicals
Pain -- Treatment -- Periodicals
Analgesia -- Periodicals
616.047205 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.lww.com/clinicalpain/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://ovidsp.tx.ovid.com/sp-3.8.1a/ovidweb.cgi?&S=KBIDFPKNAEDDLKHNNCOKIBOBIMNEAA00&Browse=Toc+Children%7cNO%7cS.sh.2.14.27%7c629%7c50 ↗
http://www.clinicalpain.com ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000766 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0749-8047
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3286.294200
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 17061.xml